Abstract 32P
Background
There is an urgent need for biomarkers to tailor neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) in early triple-negative breast cancer (eTNBC). The characterization of circulating immune subsets could provide additional information which, added to other factors, may guide clinical decisions.
Methods
In this non-randomized prospective study, patients (pt) were treated with chemotherapy (docetaxel/carboplatin or sequential paclitaxel/carboplatin with doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide) with or without pembrolizumab. Immune cell subsets were analyzed in blood by multicolor flow cytometry (MFC). Adjusted paired 2-way ANOVA was done to compare immune subsets. In this first analysis, we report the frequencies of T cell subsets before and 21 days after completing NAT, and their relationship with pathological response.
Results
15 pt achieved pathological complete response (pCR) while 6 had a RCB score of II-III. Significant differences emerged between pCR (responders) and RCB (non-responders) after NAT (Table). Non-responders presented higher drops in total lymphocytes and CD4 cells (p > 0.05). All pt increased CD8 cells, being significant only in responders (p = 0.013). CD8 subsets exhibited distinct behavior based on response. After NAT, responders showed lower activated CD8 cells, whereas non-responders had the opposite trend. Post-NAT activated CD8 cells were lower in responders (p = 0.048). An opposing pattern was observed in the dynamics of the naïve and effector memory CD8 cells (p > 0.05). In the CD4 population, after NAT all pt showed decreased activated CD4 cells. These changes were deeper and significant in responders (p = 0.048). There were no significant differences between responders and non-responders in other CD4 subsets. Table: 32P
% of cells after NAT according to response
Baseline | Post-NAT | |||||
pCR | RCB II – III | P value | pCR | RCB II – III | P value | |
Lymphocytes | 19.1 | 17.9 | 0.99 | 18.1 | 11.5 | 0.44 |
CD4+ | 38,9 | 40,1 | 0.99 | 39.3 | 32.1 | 0.36 |
Activated | 68.3 | 78.5 | 0.5 | 54.6 | 72.6 | 0.045 |
Inactivated | 31.3 | 20.4 | 0.44 | 44.6 | 26.4 | 0.039 |
Naïve | 30.3 | 45.4 | 0.16 | 19.7 | 28.1 | 0.62 |
Effector | 2.1 | 2.2 | 0.99 | 3.1 | 5.1 | 0.99 |
Effector memory | 17.5 | 12.4 | 0.89 | 26.8 | 16.1 | 0.41 |
CD8+ | 16.9 | 13.2 | 0.9 | 26.2 | 20.9 | 0.63 |
Activated | 41.3 | 40 | 0.9 | 28.8 | 49.3 | 0.048 |
Inactivated | 45.5 | 48.9 | 0.9 | 53.3 | 39.7 | 0.32 |
Naïve | 21 | 23.4 | 0.9 | 13.1 | 29.9 | 0.15 |
Effector | 31.9 | 37.2 | 0.9 | 24.2 | 29.6 | 0.9 |
Effector memory | 31.9 | 31.1 | 0.9 | 36.3 | 20.1 | 0.18 |
Conclusions
In this study, there were significant differences in the peripheral T cell subsets based on NAT response, suggesting that there may be a systemic immune activation that could impact disease control. Further research is warranted to validate and amplify these observations.
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) PI22/01346, cofinanciado por la Unión Europea.
Disclosure
I. Echavarria Diaz-Guardamino: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Lilly, AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Roche, Teva, Novartis, Pfizer, Lilly. Y. Jerez Gilarranz: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, Roche, Pfizer. F. Moreno Anton: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, MSD, Gilead; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Pfizer. J.î García Saenz: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Seagen, Gilead; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Sanofi, Novartis, Celgene, Lilly, Eisai, AstraZeneca, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Daiichi Sankyo; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Research Funding: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel: Novartis, Roche, Pfizer. C. Bueno Muiño: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca, GSK, Lilly; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Pfizer. T. Massarrah: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Novartis, Roche, GSK; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel: Novartis, AstraZeneca. M. Martin Jimenez: Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant: PUMA; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Lilly, Sanofi, Novartis, Seagen, Roche, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Roche, Seagen, Lilly, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo; Financial Interests, Personal, Leadership Role: GEICAM, TRIO. S. Lopez-Tarruella Cobo: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Lilly; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Novartis, Roche, Pfizer, Veracyte, Pierre Fabre, Lilly, Seagen, Daiichi Sankyo, Europe GmbH, Gilead Sciences, MSD, GSK. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
89P - Safety and efficacy of rechallenge with immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced solid tumor: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Huijun Xu
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
90P - Meta-analysis of hypophysitis incidence in melanoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors
Presenter: Vincas Urbonas
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
91P - Territorial disparities in the use of hospitalization at home for immune checkpoint inhibitors infusion in France between 2021 and 2022
Presenter: Anne Claire Toffart
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
92P - An investigation on the differences between the pre-treatment nutritional and immunological status of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients and the healthy population
Presenter: Qiao He
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
93P - Pseudoprogression in immunotherapy: Illusion or reality? P-PIT study
Presenter: Amelie Toulet
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
94P - Real-world characteristics, treatments and healthcare recourse utilization (HCRU) of patients (pts) with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) managed with first line (1L) immuno-oncology (IO) strategies in Greece: The IO-HORIZON study
Presenter: Dimitrios Ziogas
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
95P - Quality of life (QoL) and care pathway in patients with durable response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI-DR) for advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or melanoma: QUALICI study
Presenter: Nicolas Girard
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
96P - Comparative cardiovascular risks of PD-1 vs. PD-L1 inhibitors: A meta-analysis of incidence and severity of cardiotoxicity
Presenter: Mohammedbaqer Al-Ghuraibawi
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
97P - Cardiac risk stratification and serial monitoring during immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: Prospective real-world experience
Presenter: James Knott
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
98P - Immuno-related cardiac toxicity: a prospective study applying multiparametric cardiac MRI
Presenter: Agnese Losurdo
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract