Abstract 87P
Background
Systemic anticancer therapies have advanced beyond cytotoxic agents; checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionised cancer therapeutics and are now in routine use across multiple disease sites. The mechanism of action places patients at risk of immune-related (IR) side effects including IR colitis (IRC). The management of IRC is described in guidelines, however, in the UK access to some recommended therapies, particularly for steroid refractory IRC, including vedolizumab, remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate vedolizumab access and usage for IRC in UK hospitals.
Methods
We surveyed the use of vedolizumab across UK hospitals; the questionnaire was available between June and July 2024. Questions were developed to identify current practice focusing on preferred treatment guidelines, access to vedolizumab and treatment pathways. An electronic Microsoft Forms questionnaire was disseminated across 2 platforms; via email to all British Oncology Pharmacy Association (BOPA) members, and via presentation and QR code to Immuno-Oncology Clinical Network (IOCN) members for real-time completion. After removing duplicate hospital entries, data was analysed and grouped into themes.
Results
A total of 74 responses were received: 46% by pharmacists (n=34) and 31% by doctors (n=23). Duplicate hospital sites were subsequently combined, and the remaining 46 responses analysed. 65% hospitals (n=30) use ESMO or Clatterbridge cancer centre IRC guidelines. 93% hospitals (n=43) use infliximab 1st line in steroid refractory IRC. 57% hospitals (n=26) have used vedolizumab for 2nd line use, whilst 11% (n=5) hospitals have used it at any line of their IRC treatment pathway. 22% (n=10) hospitals have never used vedolizumab of which funding, experience, willingness to prescribe and lack of place in existing treatment pathways; are contributing factors.
Conclusions
Vedolizumab is used as a 2nd line option for IRC in over half of responding hospitals, however, there is disparity in its usage. The barriers to implementation appear to be primarily driven by funding, willingness to prescribe and experience. Real-world studies on the efficacy of Vedolizumab are warranted to further establish its place in the IRC pathway to recommend as a treatment option.
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
89P - Safety and efficacy of rechallenge with immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced solid tumor: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Huijun Xu
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
90P - Meta-analysis of hypophysitis incidence in melanoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors
Presenter: Vincas Urbonas
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
91P - Territorial disparities in the use of hospitalization at home for immune checkpoint inhibitors infusion in France between 2021 and 2022
Presenter: Anne Claire Toffart
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
92P - An investigation on the differences between the pre-treatment nutritional and immunological status of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients and the healthy population
Presenter: Qiao He
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
93P - Pseudoprogression in immunotherapy: Illusion or reality? P-PIT study
Presenter: Amelie Toulet
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
94P - Real-world characteristics, treatments and healthcare recourse utilization (HCRU) of patients (pts) with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) managed with first line (1L) immuno-oncology (IO) strategies in Greece: The IO-HORIZON study
Presenter: Dimitrios Ziogas
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
95P - Quality of life (QoL) and care pathway in patients with durable response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI-DR) for advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or melanoma: QUALICI study
Presenter: Nicolas Girard
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
96P - Comparative cardiovascular risks of PD-1 vs. PD-L1 inhibitors: A meta-analysis of incidence and severity of cardiotoxicity
Presenter: Mohammedbaqer Al-Ghuraibawi
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
97P - Cardiac risk stratification and serial monitoring during immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: Prospective real-world experience
Presenter: James Knott
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
98P - Immuno-related cardiac toxicity: a prospective study applying multiparametric cardiac MRI
Presenter: Agnese Losurdo
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract