Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display

110P - Outcomes of CUPem: A prospective Phase II multicentre clinical Trial of Pembrolizumab in patients with pre-treated Cancer of Unknown Primary

Date

07 Dec 2023

Session

Poster Display

Presenters

Harpreet Wasan

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 20 (suppl_1): 100535-100535. 10.1016/iotech/iotech100535

Authors

H.S. Wasan1, S. Rao2, S. Ngan3, C. Matei4, A.R. Sita-Lumsden5, L. Webber4, J. Mencel6, R. Elliott1, J. Lozano-Kuehne4

Author affiliations

  • 1 Hammersmith Hospital - Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London/GB
  • 2 The Royal Marsden Hospital - Chelsea, London/GB
  • 3 Guy's and St. Thomas' Hospital NHS Trust, London/GB
  • 4 Imperial College London - South Kensington Campus, London/GB
  • 5 Guy's Cancer Centre, London/GB
  • 6 The Royal Marsden Hospital (Sutton), Sutton/GB

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 110P

Background

Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) remains a common major challenge, diagnosed by serially excluding known sites of origin. Median survival, excluding rarer favourable subsets, with first-line combination cytotoxics (platinum based) remain poor under 10 months. Less than 10% are amenable to therapies linked to actionable mutations and less than 20% suitable for 2nd line therapies, with few studies beyond first line therapy and no standard of care. CUP may have unique biology in relation to immune system evasion leading to early metastatic spread. We investigated the feasibility of treatment with Pembrolizumab after failure of at least one line of therapy in a prospective phase 2 trial.

Methods

The study was initiated in 2019 to recruit a minimum of 57 CUP patients treated with and progressing after at least one line of chemotherapy with RECIST measurable disease, across 3 UK centres with Pembrolizumab 200 mg IV Q21d until disease progression or intolerance. Significant Covid trial recruitment disruption in this rare population, revised the study design down to a minimum of 31 patients, (after an interim pre-planned futility analysis at 24 patients) which gave a power 0.80 to detect a 2 months PFS improvement.

Results

35 patients consented with 30 patients assessable (Database lock Aug 2023). Median age 60 (range 33–77), 67% female, ECOG 0-1 vs 2: 83/17%. 63% had 1 line of prior chemotherapy, 27% 2 lines, 10% 3 or more lines & 10% prior radiotherapy. Median PFS (first RECIST PD) was 4.0 months (95% CI 3.2-7.5) and Median OS 11.5 months (95% CI 6.5-NR). At 6/12/18/24 & 36 months, the percentage of patients not progressing on trial treatment were 33/23/17/13/13% respectively. 2 patients who had not progressed, stopped treatment due to related AEs, one of whom has maintained stable disease for >36 mths including 9 months after discontinuation. Pembrolizumab was very well tolerated and there were no unexpected adverse events.

Conclusions

Pembrolizumab should be further investigated in CUP with promising activity and sustained disease control in a significant minority of patients beyond 2nd line with overall survival similar to first line CUP studies. Ongoing Clinico-translational research may identify predictive biomarkers.

Clinical trial identification

EudraCT: 2018-001327-39, NCT03752333.

Editorial acknowledgement

We acknowledge the contribution of Dr Michael Grayer from Floating Point Statistics Ltd who provided statistical consultancy services, supporting this conference paper by analysing the interim data as it stood on 30 August 2023, and producing production-quality tables and figures.

Legal entity responsible for the study

Imperial College London.

Funding

This research has been supported by 1) Grant Ref: MISP 55449 from Merck Sharp and Dohme Limited (MSD); 2) CUPFoundation UK; 3) SR was supported by NHS funding to the National Institute for Health and Care Research Biomedical Research Centre at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and the Institute of Cancer Research.

Disclosure

H.S. Wasan: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Advisory Boards and Invited Speaker: Incyte, Pierre Fabre, Servier, Bayer, Roche/Genentech/FM AG, Sirtex Medical Erytech, Celgene, Array BioPharma, Merck KGaA: BMS; Financial Interests, Personal, Steering Committee Member, Trial steering committee and advisory: Zymeworks; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Coordinating PI, Trial PI steering committee and advisory: Sirtex Medical; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consultancy for Submission for UK approval (BSI): ONCOSL; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role, Trial steering committee: Pfizer; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role, UK NICE submission: Bayer, Pierre Fabre. S. Rao: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Merck Serono, Servier, Seagen, AstraZeneca, Hoopika, Bayer, BeiGene; Financial Interests, Personal, Expert Testimony: Boehringer; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Merck Serono, Servier, Bayer. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.