Abstract 97P
Background
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most often-diagnosed cancer in both men and women, with more than 1.9 million new cases worldwide in 2020. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) show modest activity and efficacy in microsatellite stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients harbouring a proficient mismatch repair system (pMMR). However, even the fact that MSS tumours are infiltrated by T cells was proved, they will not respond to therapy with anti-PD-1 mAbs as they do not express ICI but escape from immunosurveillance, for example, by downregulating HLA expression. Importantly, there is a hypothesis that a particular fraction of non-hypermutated MSS tumours might in theory respond to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy. Some trials demonstrated benefits for surveillance for MSS tumours treated by intensive combination of chemotherapy with ICI, but fragile and older patients cannot receive these regimens. Treatment with less toxicity could be the option for some specific group of patients with MSS tumours.
Methods
We performed a retrospective analysis of the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib for late-stage colorectal cancer as a salvage line. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival distribution and response rate (RR).
Results
There were 20 cases (male:13, female:7), and the median average age was 63 (32-75) years old. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 4.5 (95%CI;1.4-14) months and 10 (95%CI;2.5-26.4) months, respectively. Response rate (RR) was 16% and disease control rate (DCR) was 25.6%. Also in analysis, Grade 2 or more severe diarrhea was an independent prognostic factor for PFS (p = 0.004) and OS (p < 0.0001). The common treatment-related adverse events were gastrointestinal toxicity and hepatic dysfunction, but they were not severe and no treatment related death was observed.
Conclusions
Even though LEAP-017 was not effective, we suggest that some populations of patients could have benefits from this regimen as a salvage therapy for MSS colorectal cancer. Also, our findings assume that the possibility that Grade 2 or more severe diarrhea may be a predictive factor. In conclusion, we think that further investigations in this field are needed.
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
60P - Adaptive NK cells as a therapeutic option for childhood leukaemia
Presenter: Zoya Eskandarian
Session: Poster Display
61P - Unlocking the Power of Natural Killer Cells: Precision Selection with Cutting-Edge Microfluidics
Presenter: Neelima KC
Session: Poster Display
63TiP - A phase I study of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in advanced solid tumors used an optimized regimen: MIZAR trial
Presenter: Qing Xu
Session: Poster Display
68P - Real-world (rw) outcomes in patients (pts) with metastatic (m) NSCLC and STK11, KEAP1 and/or KRAS mutations (mut) receiving PD-(L)1-based treatment (tx): CORRELATE
Presenter: Solange Peters
Session: Poster Display
70P - LIST (Lung Initiative on Sequence Therapy), a real-world study of nivolumab for advanced NSCLC in France: first effectiveness, safety, and IO-rechallenge results
Presenter: Benoît GODBERT
Session: Poster Display
72P - Camrelizumab plus apatinib after chemoradiotherapy in unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer?A multi-center, single-arm, phase 2 study
Presenter: Hui Zhouguang
Session: Poster Display
74P - A single-center, Phase II study of surufatinib combined with toripalimab, pemetrexed(A), and platinum (P) in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (nsq-NSCLC)
Presenter: Wen Feng Fang
Session: Poster Display
75P - Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of cemiplimab + chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): EMPOWER-lung 3 liver metastases subpopulation
Presenter: Ana Baramidze
Session: Poster Display