Abstract 97P
Background
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most often-diagnosed cancer in both men and women, with more than 1.9 million new cases worldwide in 2020. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) show modest activity and efficacy in microsatellite stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients harbouring a proficient mismatch repair system (pMMR). However, even the fact that MSS tumours are infiltrated by T cells was proved, they will not respond to therapy with anti-PD-1 mAbs as they do not express ICI but escape from immunosurveillance, for example, by downregulating HLA expression. Importantly, there is a hypothesis that a particular fraction of non-hypermutated MSS tumours might in theory respond to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy. Some trials demonstrated benefits for surveillance for MSS tumours treated by intensive combination of chemotherapy with ICI, but fragile and older patients cannot receive these regimens. Treatment with less toxicity could be the option for some specific group of patients with MSS tumours.
Methods
We performed a retrospective analysis of the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib for late-stage colorectal cancer as a salvage line. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival distribution and response rate (RR).
Results
There were 20 cases (male:13, female:7), and the median average age was 63 (32-75) years old. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 4.5 (95%CI;1.4-14) months and 10 (95%CI;2.5-26.4) months, respectively. Response rate (RR) was 16% and disease control rate (DCR) was 25.6%. Also in analysis, Grade 2 or more severe diarrhea was an independent prognostic factor for PFS (p = 0.004) and OS (p < 0.0001). The common treatment-related adverse events were gastrointestinal toxicity and hepatic dysfunction, but they were not severe and no treatment related death was observed.
Conclusions
Even though LEAP-017 was not effective, we suggest that some populations of patients could have benefits from this regimen as a salvage therapy for MSS colorectal cancer. Also, our findings assume that the possibility that Grade 2 or more severe diarrhea may be a predictive factor. In conclusion, we think that further investigations in this field are needed.
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
35P - Peripheral immunotype classification for monitoring Soft Tissue Sarcoma patients
Presenter: Jani Sofia Almeida
Session: Poster Display
36P - Expression of germinal center B cell- and Th17 cell-related transcripts are prognostic of soft-tissue sarcoma patient outcomes
Presenter: Giulia Petroni
Session: Poster Display
38P - Machine learning-based pathomics model to predict the infiltration of Treg and prognosis in IDH-wt GBM
Presenter: Shaoli Peng
Session: Poster Display
40P - The role of low avidity tumour-specific CD8+ T cells in immunotherapeutic response to anti-PD-1
Presenter: Doreen Lau
Session: Poster Display
41P - Contrasting drivers of response to immunotherapy across solid tumour types: results from analysis of >2500 cases
Presenter: Danwen Qian
Session: Poster Display
42P - TCCIA: A Comprehensive Resource for Exploring CircRNA in Cancer Immunotherapy
Presenter: Jian-Guo Zhou
Session: Poster Display
43P - Immune and tumor cells expression of VISTA in a panel of cancer indications: A strategy to inform selection of patients treated with anti-VISTA
Presenter: Pierre Launay
Session: Poster Display
44P - Exploratory Analysis of Peripheral Pharmacodynamic (PD) Biomarkers After Sitravatinib (Sitra) and Tislelizumab (TIS) in Advanced Solid Tumors: SAFFRON-103
Presenter: Yi-Long Wu
Session: Poster Display
45P - Protein biomarkers associated with organ-specific immune-related toxicity and response to management identified by proteome analysis of extracellular vesicles from plasma
Presenter: Anders Kverneland
Session: Poster Display