Abstract 188P
Background
Immune checkpoint inhibitors revolutionized treatment of both locally advanced and metastatic melanoma patients, yet some patients fail to achieve long-lasting benefit or progress on treatment, highlighting the need for new immune-modulatory agents. The co-stimulatory ligand OX40L and its receptor OX40 (also named TNFSF4/ TNFRSF4) were previously shown to elicit anti-tumor immune responses in pre-clinical cancer models. This led to several clinical trials of OX40-agonism as therapeutic interventions in cancer, which showed limited efficacy thus far. We previously analyzed RNA-sequencing data of OX40L expression in melanoma and found that low mRNA expression was associated with worse prognosis and with worse outcome following anti-PD1 treatment. These findings encouraged further studies to substantiate the role of OX40L in the melanoma microenvironment.
Methods
Multiplex immunofluorescent microscopy was used to evaluate the expression of OX40L/OX40 in FFPE surgical specimens of primary/metastatic melanoma tumors. Previously established cell-specific markers were used in parallel to identify OX40L- expressing cell phenotypes. Quantification was performed with GEN5 PRIME software.
Results
OX40L+ cells were detected in 15/16 tumors tested, in variable abundances, which correlated with the abundance of OX40+ cells and with co-localization events of OX40L+/OX40+ cells, suggesting functional OX40 ligand-receptor interactions. OX40L expression was frequently detected on Macrophages/Dentritic-cells, less on CD4+ or CD8+ T cells and rarely on melanoma cells. Unexpectedly, we now identified high prevalence of OX40L expression on Foxp3+ regulatory T cells (Treg), in addition to OX40, which was previously shown to antagonize their suppressive function.
Conclusions
Here we show that OX40L is abundantly expressed, together with OX40, on Treg within the melanoma micro-environment. These novel findings may suggest a role for OX40L in modulating Treg suppressive activity. If further proven, our observations may be important in prognostication and prediction of response in melanoma. Furthermore, they may point to new IO combinations for further research and have therapeutic implications towards ‘heating’ up tumors.
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Israeli Cancer Association (ICA).
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
35P - Peripheral immunotype classification for monitoring Soft Tissue Sarcoma patients
Presenter: Jani Sofia Almeida
Session: Poster Display
36P - Expression of germinal center B cell- and Th17 cell-related transcripts are prognostic of soft-tissue sarcoma patient outcomes
Presenter: Giulia Petroni
Session: Poster Display
38P - Machine learning-based pathomics model to predict the infiltration of Treg and prognosis in IDH-wt GBM
Presenter: Shaoli Peng
Session: Poster Display
40P - The role of low avidity tumour-specific CD8+ T cells in immunotherapeutic response to anti-PD-1
Presenter: Doreen Lau
Session: Poster Display
41P - Contrasting drivers of response to immunotherapy across solid tumour types: results from analysis of >2500 cases
Presenter: Danwen Qian
Session: Poster Display
42P - TCCIA: A Comprehensive Resource for Exploring CircRNA in Cancer Immunotherapy
Presenter: Jian-Guo Zhou
Session: Poster Display
43P - Immune and tumor cells expression of VISTA in a panel of cancer indications: A strategy to inform selection of patients treated with anti-VISTA
Presenter: Pierre Launay
Session: Poster Display
44P - Exploratory Analysis of Peripheral Pharmacodynamic (PD) Biomarkers After Sitravatinib (Sitra) and Tislelizumab (TIS) in Advanced Solid Tumors: SAFFRON-103
Presenter: Yi-Long Wu
Session: Poster Display
45P - Protein biomarkers associated with organ-specific immune-related toxicity and response to management identified by proteome analysis of extracellular vesicles from plasma
Presenter: Anders Kverneland
Session: Poster Display