Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display

72P - Treatments response in non-small cell lung cancer patients according to BRCA status on liquid biopsy: a retrospective analysis

Date

08 Dec 2022

Session

Poster Display

Presenters

Leonardo Provenzano

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 16 (suppl_1): 100102-100102. 10.1016/iotech/iotech100102

Authors

L. Provenzano1, A. Bottiglieri2, A. Spagnoletti1, G. Di Guida3, J. Filosa4, L. Mazzeo1, C. Giani5, V. Miskovic6, C.M. Della Corte7, G. Viscardi7, A. Prelaj5

Author affiliations

  • 1 Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano - Fondazione IRCCS, Milan/IT
  • 2 Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan/IT
  • 3 Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Caserta/IT
  • 4 Università degli studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Napoli/IT
  • 5 Fondazione IRCCS - Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan/IT
  • 6 Politecnico di Milano, Milan/IT
  • 7 Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Napoli/IT

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 72P

Background

NSCLC has to date a poor prognosis with life expectancy at five year of 26%. The development of precision medicine is going to improve the prognosis, but most of alterations are still lacking of clinical significance. Somatic BRCA alterations, is reported to be quite frequent in NSCLC, with a prevalence of 5.3-6.6%. However, no specific study to date specifically evaluated its prognostic and predictive role in this population of patients.

Methods

We evaluated BRCA status of aNSCLC patients undergone liquid biopsy at Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori in Milan and Luigi Vanvitelli Hospital in Naples. Guardant360CDx® was used and mutations pathogenicity were interpreted based on the COSMIC database. Only mutations interpreted as pathogenic were considered. Chi square and Fisher tests were used to match clinical characteristics with BRCA status and survival outcomes were analysed with Cox model.

Results

307 patients had BRCA status available on liquid biopsy, of which 33 (10.7%) had a pathogenic mutation in BRCA1/2 genes. BRCAm patients were older, more frequently male and smoker, had a higher PS and higher PDL1 expression on tissue samples; however, none of these features was significantly associated except for PS. Among patients treated with first-line platinum-based CT, a trend for better PFS was observed among BRCAm patients vs wt, without reaching statistical significance (HR 0.76, CI 95% 0.43-1.35, p=0.354). An increased platinum ORR was observed in BRCA mut vs wt patients (47.6% vs 34.0%, p=0.012). Conversely, among patients treated with any-line IOT, a worse PFS was observed among BRCAm patients vs wt (mPFS 3.5 vs 7.2 m; HR 2.14, CI 95% 1.35-3.40; p=0.001) and numerically reduced ORR was also observed (13.0% vs 26.8%, p=0.192). Finally, BRCA mutations seem to do not have impact on OS (BRCAm vs wt: 28.2 vs 28.8 m; HR 1.17, CI 95% 0.76-1.79; p=0.482).

Conclusions

In our retrospective cohort of aNSCLC patients, presence of a pathogenic mutation in BRCA1/2 genes resulted in reduced benefit to IOT, without affecting overall survival, probably due of the counterbalance effect of the increased sensitivity to platinum-CT. These data could be used to guide therapeutic choices and therefore deserve to be confirmed in a prospective cohort.

Legal entity responsible for the study

Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.