Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display

78P - Clinical outcomes with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (AB) or lenvatinib (L) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Date

08 Dec 2022

Session

Poster Display

Presenters

MARA PERSANO

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 16 (suppl_1): 100102-100102. 10.1016/iotech/iotech100102

Authors

M. PERSANO1, M. Rimini2, S. Cascinu3, M. Scartozzi4, A. Casadei Gardini3

Author affiliations

  • 1 AOU di Cagliari - Ospedale Civile, Cagliari/IT
  • 2 IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan/IT
  • 3 Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute Hospital, Milan/IT
  • 4 Policlinico Universitario Monserrato, 9042 - Monserrato/IT

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 78P

Background

The aim of this multicenter study is to compare response obtained by AB o L and identify any factors that may predict the emergence of this response to one of two treatments in a real-world setting.

Methods

Study population derived from retrospective analysis of prospectively collected HCC patients (P) treated with AB or L as first-line treatment. ORR with AB vs L was the primary endpoint. The secondary endpoint compared OS with L vs AB in terms of best response.

Results

1312 P were treated with L, and 823 P were treated with AB. ORR was 38.6% for P receiving L, and 27.3% for P receiving AB [p < 0.01; odds ratio (OR) 0.60)]. In responding P (CR + PR), OS was 22.3 months (m) for P receiving L, and 22.5 m for P treated with AB (p 0.20; HR 0.81, reference L). In non-responding P (SD + PD), OS was 10.8 m for P receiving L, and 11.5 m for P receiving AB (p 0.36; HR 0.85, reference L). For P who achieved CR, OS was not reached in both arms, but the result from univariate Cox regression model showed 62% reduction of death risk for P treated with AB (p 0.05). In all multivariate analyses, treatment arm was not found to be an independent factor conditioning OS. Comparing ORR achieved in the two arms, L was shown to be statistically significant in all subgroup P except for Child Pugh B, presence of portal vein thrombosis (PT), αFP ≥ 400 ng/mL, presence of extrahepatic disease (EHD), ALBI 2, and no previous locoregional procedures. P who achieved CR were compared to the rest of the population in the same way. The only statistically significant difference was in favor of L in P with NLR > 3 (p 0.03; OR 0.39). Finally, we evaluated separately which P had more response in AB arm and then in L arm. Only in L arm, three factors favoring response were highlighted: absence of EHD (p < 0.01; OR 1.88), BCLC B (p < 0.01; OR 0.54), absence of PT (p 0.05; OR 1.34), and NLR ≤ 3 (p < 0.01; OR 0.70).

Conclusions

L achieve higher ORR in all P subgroups. P who achieve CR with AB can achieve OS so far never recorded in HCC patients. This study didn’t highlight any factors that could identify HCC P subgroups capable of obtaining CR.

Legal entity responsible for the study

M. Persano.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.