Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display

30P - Cemiplimab in treatment of metastatic and recurrent cervical cancer

Date

20 Jun 2024

Session

Poster Display

Presenters

Farrukh Djuraev

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 9 (suppl_5): 1-7. 10.1016/esmoop/esmoop103498

Authors

F. Djuraev1, A.S. Abdujapparov2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Tashkent Medical Park, Tashkent/UZ
  • 2 Tashkent City Branch of the Republican Specialized Scientific and Practical Medical Center of Oncology and Radiology, Tashkent/UZ

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 30P

Background

Patients with recurrent cervical cancer have a poor prognosis. Cemiplimab, the fully human programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)-blocking antibody approved to treat lung and skin cancers, has been shown to have preliminary clinical activity in this population.

Methods

Our research included patients who had disease progression after first-line platinum-containing chemotherapy, regardless of their combined positive score (CPS) status. Women were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive cemiplimab (350 mg every 3 weeks) or the physician’s choice of single-agent chemotherapy. The primary end point was overall survival. Progression-free survival and safety were also assessed.

Results

A total of 180 women were included in our research (90 in each group). Overall median overall survival was longer in the cemiplimab group than in the chemotherapy group (12.4 months vs. 7.5 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56 to 0.84; two-sided P<0.001). The overall survival benefit was consistent in both histologic subgroups (squamous-cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma [including adenosquamous carcinoma]). Progression-free survival was also longer in the cemiplimab group than in the chemotherapy group in the overall population (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.89; two-sided P<0.001). In the overall population, an objective response occurred in 16.1% (95% CI, 12.5 to 21.1) of the patients in the cemiplimab group, as compared with 6.3% (95% CI, 3.8 to 9.6) in the chemotherapy group. An objective response occurred in 18% (95% CI, 11 to 28) of the cemiplimab-treated patients with PD-L1 expression greater than or equal to 1% and in 11% (95% CI, 4 to 25) of those with PD-L1 expression of less than 1%. Overall, grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 45.0% of the patients who received cemiplimab and in 53.4% of those who received chemotherapy.

Conclusions

Survival was significantly longer with cemiplimab than with single-agent chemotherapy among patients with recurrent cervical cancer after first-line platinum-containing chemotherapy.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.