Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

72P - The RAS status change in mCRC after progression on the first-line therapy using the Idylla RT- PCR platform

Date

27 Jun 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Hampig Raphael Kourie

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_1): S1-S74. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1477

Authors

H.R. Kourie1, Z. Zalaquett1, J. Zouein1, A. Chebly1, L.F. Nasr1, F. El Karak1, M. Sadek2, O. Safar3, M. Fouani4, N. Bitar5, K.M. Kachmar6, F.L. Nasr1, F.S.S. Farhat7, J.A. Makarem8, J.G. Kattan1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Saint Joseph University - Faculty of Medicine, Beirut/LB
  • 2 Geitawi Hospital, Beirut/LB
  • 3 Dar Al-Amal University Hospital, Baalbek/LB
  • 4 Al-Rassoul Al-Aazam hospital, Beirut/LB
  • 5 Sahel General Hospital, Beirut/LB
  • 6 Tibnine Governmental Hospital, Tebnine/LB
  • 7 HHUMC - Hammoud Hospital University Medical Center, Sidon/LB
  • 8 Ain Wazein Hospital, Ain Wazien/LB

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 72P

Background

Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) demonstrate inconsistent RAS status before and after treatment. Some tumors develop RAS mutation as a mechanism of resistance to anti-EGFR. Conversely, following chemotherapy, a number of individuals with RAS-mut mCRC lose their mutation and develop a RAS-wt status, making the NeoRAS phenomenon an important aspect of mCRC treatment. The objective of this study is to characterize the RAS mutational status change in patients who have progressed after a first-line therapy regimen through the use of liquid biopsy.

Methods

This study is part of the Lebanese NEORAS trial. It is a phase IV, observational of Lebanese patients diagnosed with mCRC and followed-up during the course of their treatment. At diagnosis, the tumor RAS status was tested with liquid biopsy and confirmed by a tissue biopsy. Patients were followed up monthly after their diagnosis, and upon confirmed clinical progression, and before initiation of a second-line therapy a liquid biopsy to monitor the mutational profile of the tumor using the Idylla RT-PCR platform.

Results

One hundred patients were initially enrolled. Forty-three 43 out of the 100 patients have progressed on their first line of therapy. At baseline testing, before chemotherapy initiation, 25 (58%) patients had a RAS-mut tumor with a mutation being found at least on the tissue or the liquid biopsy and 18 (42%) patients had a RAS-wt phenotype. Upon progression after first-line therapy, 20 of the 25 (80%) patients initially RAS-mut patients conserved their mutation while 5 (20%) shifted towards a RAS-wt phenotype after one line of therapy. Conversely, 16 of the 18 (89%) patients who were initially RAS-wt conserved this phenotype while 2 (11%) patients developed a RAS mutation.

Conclusions

In conclusion, this study has characterized of RAS mutational shift after mCRC first-line treatment using liquid biopsy. The best time for retesting has not yet been established. Further studies are needed to assess the best strategy for RAS status monitoring.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Merck, KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, Biocartis.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.