Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

12P - The prognostic significance of BRAF mutations in early-stage colon cancer

Date

27 Jun 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Laurie-Rose Dubé

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_1): S1-S74. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1477

Authors

L. Dubé1, M. Dankner2, A. Stein1, A. Nowakowski1, L. Park1, J. Magrill1, J. Romero1, M. Sorin1, A. Lazaratos1, P. Kavan3, A.A..N. Rose3, K. Ma1

Author affiliations

  • 1 McGill University, Montreal/CA
  • 2 Goodman Cancer Research Center - McGill University, Montreal/CA
  • 3 Jewish General Hospital McGill University, Montreal/CA

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 12P

Background

BRAF mutations are found in approximately 10% of colon cancers (CC) and are associated with poor prognosis in the context of metastatic disease. The most common BRAF mutation, V600E, predicts response to treatment with cetuximab + encorafenib +/- binimetinib in the metastatic setting. With the opening of the AO22004 and TRESBIEN trials that will test encorafenib-containing regimens for early-stage CC with BRAF V600E, there is renewed interest in better understanding the natural history of these cancers.

Methods

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and retrospective studies from patients with early-stage BRAF mutant CC. Key inclusion criteria were: a diagnosis of stage 2 or stage 3 colon cancer with BRAF mutation. Patients who received neoadjuvant treatment, and patients with rectal cancers were excluded. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). A meta-analysis was performed with a random effects model that incorporated sample size, hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results

Of 206 studies that underwent full-text review, 6 randomized controlled trials and 3 additional retrospective studies were included in the final analysis that comprised a total of 7242 and 884 patients with wild-type and mutated BRAF, respectively. BRAF mutation was associated with shortened OS (HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.30-1.85, I2=48.2%) and RFS (HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.09-1.72, I2=78%) in the cohort at-large. This finding remains when analyses are constrained to include only microsatellite instability-low / stable (MSS/ MSI-L) / proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) (OS: HR 1.71, 95% CI 1.17-2.49, I2=47.9%, RFS: HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.22-1.72, I2=0%) but not those with microsatellite instability-high / unstable (MSI/ MSI-H) / deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) (OS: HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.27-1.67, RFS: HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.60-1.82, I2=36.4%).

Conclusions

BRAF mutation in early-stage CC is associated with inferior prognosis compared to BRAF wild-type, particularly in MSS/MSI-L/pMMR tumors. This finding will help optimize clinical trial design for this patient population.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Pfizer.

Disclosure

P. Kavan: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Roche Canada, Eisai, Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Pfizer, Amgen, Taiho Pharmaceutical. A.A.N. Rose: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Employment: Merck; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: EMD Serono, Advanced Accelerator Applications/Novartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Merck; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: AstraZeneca Canada, Merck, Pfizer, Seagen; Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant: Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Canadian Cancer Society, Conquer Cancer Foundation, Jewish General Hospital Foundation, TransMed Tech Institute, Canada Foundation for Innovation. K. Ma: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel/Accommodation: Pfizer, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Eisai; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria: Pfizer, Ipsen, Novartis, Amgen, Merck, Merck, Roche, Eisan. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.