Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

79P - The prevalence of class I, II, and III BRAF mutations in colorectal cancer and their prognostic significance

Date

27 Jun 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Amer Qolaghassi

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_1): S1-S74. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1477

Authors

A. Qolaghassi1, M.F. Al-Jafari1, M. Khushman2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Mutah University, Al-Karak/JO
  • 2 Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis - Siteman Cancer Center, St. Louis/US

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 79P

Background

The current literature suggests that the prevalence of BRAF mutations in colorectal cancer (CRC) is around 8.7%. Class I, II, and III the reported prevalence is 6.7 %, 0.5%, and 1.2% respectively. Other pathogenic BRAF mutations were reported in 0.12%. The prognosis of CRC patients with BRAF mutations has been described to be worse than CRC patients with BRAF wild type (WT). It is unclear if this is limited to BRAF class I or applies to classes II and III. Here we have explored the prevalence of BRAF class I, II, and III mutations in a large cohort of patients and their prognostic significance.

Methods

Genomic data were sourced from cBioCancer Genomics Portal. The prevalence of BRAF class I, II, and III were estimated in the metastatic colorectal cancer MSK cohort comprising 1134 patients. The association between BRAF class I, II, and III mutations and median overall survival (mOS) was explored. The log-rank test was used to compare mOS between groups of patients with different types of BRAF mutations.

Results

Among the 1134 patients in this cohort, 119 patients (10.5%) had BRAF mutations. Class I (V600E), class II (K601E, G496A), and class III (G466V, N581S, G496E, N581I, D594G, D594N, G596R) were reported in 74 (6.5%), 7 (0.6%) and 17 (1.5%) patients, respectively. Other BRAF pathogenic alterations (H574Y, A33T, P227Hfs*2, A33T, F294L, Y633C, E501K, Y472S, D594V, L312P, A404Cfs*9, D284Efs*4, R558Q, P162S, T599delinsIP, F583C, R6030O, P403Lfs*8, S602Y, A404Cfs*9, R354* and Q356K) were reported in 21 (1.9%) patients. The mOS in patients with BRAF WT was longer than in patients with BRAF class I mutations (70m vs. 18m; p<0.001). The mOS in patients with class II and III BRAF mutations was longer than in patients with class I BRAF mutations (45m vs. 18m; p=0.011). The mOS in patients with BRAF WT was numerically longer than patients with class II and III BRAF mutations (70m vs 45m; p=0.158).

Conclusions

The prevalence of BRAF class I, II, and III in our cohort of patients with CRC was 6.5%, 0.6% and 1.5%. The mOS of patients with BRAF class I was worse than patients with BRAF WT and class II and II.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.