Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

295P - The impact of resection margin positive according to lymph node metastasis status in survival of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

Date

27 Jun 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Poowanai Sarkhampee

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_1): S119-S161. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1481

Authors

P. Sarkhampee1, W. Ouransatien2, N. Lertsawatvicha2, S. Chansitthichok2, P. Wattanarath2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Sunpasithiprasong Hospital, Ubon Ratchathani/TH
  • 2 Sunpasitthiprasong Hospital, Ubon Ratchathani/TH

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 295P

Background

The prognostic factors for survival in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) included resection margin (RM) and lymph node metastases (LNM). Nevertheless, the contentious nature of the advantage associated with a negative RM in patients with LNM remains unresolved.

Methods

The present study retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with pCCA who underwent surgical resection with or without adjuvant treatment at Sunpasitthiprasong Hospital between October 2013 and December 2018. The analysis excluded patients who experienced mortality within 90 days. The evaluation of overall survival was conducted based on the presence of LNM and the status of RM.

Results

Of the 172 resected pCCA patients, 87 (50.6%) were LNM negative, and 85 (49.4%) were LNM positive. Of the 87 LNM-negative patients, 66 (75.9%) were RM negative, and 21 (24.1%) were RM positive. In LNM-negative patients, overall survival was shorter in the RM positive than the RM-negative group (median survival time: 33.9 vs 15.6 months, respectively; p<0.001). Of the 85 LNM-positive patients, 34 (40.0%) were RM negative and 51 (60.0%) were RM positive. In LNM-positive patients, overall survival was remained worse in the RM positive compared to the RM negative group (median survival time: 9.7 vs 6.5 months, respectively; p=0.026). In addition, RM positive was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival in both univariable and multivariable analyses of LNM-negative and LNM-positive patients. Table: 295P

Univariable and multivariable analysis of prognostic factors for long-term survival in pCCA patient with LNM positive

Characteristics Univariable Multivariable
HR 95%CI p HR 95%CI p
Bismuth type IV 1.297 0.735-2.287 0.369
Blood transfusion 1.403 0.871-2.259 0.161
Tumor size (cm) >3 cm 1.683 1.018-2.781 0.040 1.705 0.913-3.184 0.094
Positive resection margin 1.696 1.061-2.711 0.026 2.031 1.162-3.551 0.013
pT3-4 staging 0.798 0.508-1.253 0.326
Moderate/Poor differentiation 1.561 0.930-2.621 0.089
Lymphovascular invasion 0.389 0.209-0.726 0.002 0.393 0.209-0.740 0.004
Perineural invasion 0.631 0.194-2.052 0.439
Vascular invasion 0.865 0.543-1.380 0.543

Conclusions

In patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, the RM status was an important prognostic factor for both LNM-negative and LNM-positive patients.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.