Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

412P - Survival outcome and safety of different treatment models in patients with oligometastatic esophageal cancer with only distant lymph node metastasis

Date

27 Jun 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Xiaolin Qiu

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_1): S162-S204. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1482

Authors

X. Qiu1, B. Fan2, L. Wang2

Author affiliations

  • 1 School of Clinical Medicine, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang/CN
  • 2 Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Jinan/CN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 412P

Background

This study is to explore a more effective treatment model for patients with oligometastatic esophageal cancer (OMEC) presenting solely distant lymph node metastasis.

Methods

This cohort study retrospectively collected clinical data of patients with OMEC presenting solely distant lymph node metastasis. 107 patients were included in an institutional review board (IRB)-approved study, of which 35 received immunochemotherapy, 25 received concurrent radiochemotherapy and 47 received chemoradiotherapy combined with immunotherapy. Study endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), treatment-related toxicities.

Results

A total of 107 patients were included, whom were diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma histology and presented with synchronous OMEC with distant lymph node metastasis. Compared to patients receiving immunochemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy combined with immunotherapy significantly improved PFS (13.62 months vs. 6.65 months, P=0.0072), but not the OS (30.71 months vs. 31.0 months, P=0.4542). Compared with immunochemotherapy, concurrent radiochemotherapy offered significant OS (36.65 months vs. 31.0 months, P= 0.0169), but PFS was not significant (9.61 months vs. 6.65 months, p=0.2767). 19 (55.88%) patients in immunochemotherapy group, 19 (76.00%) patients in concurrent radiochemotherapy group and 42 (89.36%) patients in chemoradiotherapy combined with immunotherapy group developed grade ≥ 3 hematologic toxicities. Leukopenia is the most common hematologic toxicity. Compared with concurrent radiochemotherapy or immunochemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy combined with immunotherapy may increase hematologic or non-hematologic toxicity.

Conclusions

This study provides real-world evidence for the effectiveness of different treatment models on survival outcome in oligometastatic esophageal cancer with only distant lymph node metastasis. Comparing the three treatment options, concurrent radiochemotherapy can prolong the survival of patients with few adverse reactions. Although chemoradiotherapy combined with immunotherapy can prolong the PFS of patients, it should also prevent the occurrence of adverse events.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.