Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

89P - Real-world study of late-line treatment regimens for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): A multi-cohort, propensity-matched analysis

Date

27 Jun 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Wangxia Lv

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_1): S1-S74. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1477

Authors

W. Lv1, B. Liu2, T. Feng2, Z. Shi2, J. Cheng2, M. Yuan2, H. Zhong2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Hutchison MediPharma Limited - Research Center, Shanghai/CN
  • 2 Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences/ Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou/CN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 89P

Background

Fruquintinib (Fru) is a VEGFR1/2/3 inhibitor approved for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Regorafenib (Reg) and TAS-102 have shown promise in mCRC treatment. This study evaluated the efficacy of Fru, Reg (monotherapy or combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors, ICIs), and TAS-102 with bevacizumab (Bev) in mCRC.

Methods

This retrospective study analyzed the efficacy across three cohorts among 418 mCRC patients: cohort 1 (168 patients) received Fru (98 patients) or Reg (70 patients) monotherapy, cohort 2 (171 patients) received Fru (104 patients) or Reg (67 patients) plus ICIs, and patients in cohort 3 (183 patients) received either Fru plus ICIs (104 patients) or TAS-102 plus Bev (79 patients). Propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized to minimize baseline differences. Through univariate and multivariate analyses, the study identified prognostic factors across cohorts, focusing on median overall survival (mOS) as the primary measure.

Results

Our study found that the mOS of Fru/Reg monotherapy, Fru/Reg combined with ICIs, TAS-102 combined with Bev was 11.3, 15.7, and 8.9 months, respectively, p= 0.00079. In cohort 1, pre- and post-matching mOS for Fru versus Reg monotherapy was 12.7 vs. 10.4 (HR= 0.679, p= 0.024) and 12.8 vs. 10.4 months (HR= 0.635, p= 0.009), respectively. In cohort 2, pre- and post-matching mOS for Fru with ICIs versus Reg with ICIs was 17.4 vs. 13.9 (HR= 0.588, p= 0.0081) and 23.6 vs. 13.9 months (HR= 0.544, p= 0.008), respectively. In cohort 3, pre- and post-matching mOS for Fru with ICIs versus TAS-102 with Bev was 17.4 vs. 8.9 (HR= 0.468, p<0.0001) and 15.4 vs. 6.6 months (HR= 0.504, p= 0.003), respectively. Particularly, lung metastasis was a favorable prognostic factor in cohort 1. In cohort 2 and cohort 3, BRAF wild-type, single metastatic lesion and third-line treatment were favorable in both univariate and multivariate analyses.

Conclusions

In patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, the combination of Fru/Reg and ICIs showed superior efficacy than Fru/Reg monotherapy or TAS-102 plus Bev. Treatment with Fru, whether as monotherapy or in conjunction with ICIs, surpassed other therapeutic options, consistent with observations from real-world clinical practice.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.