Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

247P - Radiotherapy (RT), atezolizumab (atezo) and bevacizumab (bev) to increase organ preservation in rectal cancer: The TARZAN study

Date

27 Jun 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Peter de Gooyer

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_1): S106-S118. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1480

Authors

P.G.M. de Gooyer1, Y.L. Verschoor1, A.G. Aalbers1, D.M.J. Lambregts1, B. van Triest1, F. Peters1, M.E. van Leerdam1, S. Dokter1, G.L. Beets1, I. Huibregtse1, R.G. Beets-Tan2, S. Balduzzi1, B.A. Grotenhuis1, J.G. van den Berg3, M. Chalabi3

Author affiliations

  • 1 NKI-AVL - Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam/NL
  • 2 Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (NKI-AVL), Amsterdam/NL
  • 3 Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam/NL

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 247P

Background

Organ preservation (OP) for pts with rectal cancer (RC) is gaining momentum considering the morbidity associated with total mesorectal excision (TME). Current treatments to achieve OP involve radio- and/or chemotherapy, and while escalation to total neoadjuvant therapy increases OP rates, this is associated with increased toxicity. In the current study, we investigated efficacy of RT, atezo and bev in pts with early and intermediate stage RC with the aim of increasing chances of OP.

Methods

Pts with stage ≤T3ab, N0-1, MRF- RC were treated with 5x5 Gy RT followed by 3 cycles of atezo/bev. The primary endpoint would be met if a (near) clinical complete response(cCR) rate of >25% was achieved at 12 weeks, as measured by endoscopy and MRI. Secondary endpoints include pathologic response, OP rate, safety and relapse free survival. Here we report results from the fully accrued study.

Results

38 pts with MMR proficient (pMMR) and 6 pts with MMR deficient (dMMR) tumors were treated (Table). Results are shown separately. At 12 weeks a (near)cCR was observed in 17/38 (45%, 7 cCR + 10 near cCR) pMMR pts, meeting the primary endpoint. The (near)cCR rates in tumors <40mm or N0 disease were 57% and 59%, respectively. At a median follow-up of 23 months, 16 (42%) pts remain TME-free. Five pts developed distant recurrences, including 1 pt in the OP group. Of 26 pts undergoing tumor excision (21 TME, 5 local excision), 6 had a major pathologic response (MPR), including 2 pCRs. In total, 22/38 pts had either MPR or (near)cCR. All 6 pts with a dMMR tumor had a cCR and remain TME- and disease-free. Grade 3-4 immune-related adverse events were observed in 7% of pts. Table: 247P

Characteristic pMMR cohort n = 38 dMMR cohort n = 6
Median age yrs (range) 63 (42-79) 60 (40-83)
Male 30 (79%) 4 (67%)
ECOG PS 0 37 (97%) 5 (83%)
1 1 (3%) 1 (17%)
cT-stage T1-2 15 (39%) 1 (17%)
T3ab 22 (58%) 5 (83%)
T4a 1 (3%) 0
cN-stage N0 22 (58%) 1 (17%)
N+ 16 (42%) 5 (83%)
Tumor size <40 mm 23 (61%) 3 (50%) 3 (50%)
≥40 mm 15 (39%)
Tumor location
Proximal (>10cm from anorectal junction) 1 (3%) 0
Mid (5-10 cm from anorectal junction) 7 (18%) 2 (33%)
Distal (<5cm anorectal junction) 30 (79%) 4 (67%)

∗As assessed on MRI

Conclusions

Short course RT followed by a short treatment of atezo/bev resulted in high rates of clinical and pathologic response and an OP rate of 42% in pMMR and 100% in dMMR tumors. These data suggest that benefit of immunotherapy may be extended to pMMR RC and future studies should explore optimal dosing, sequence and duration of therapy.

Clinical trial identification

NCT04017455.

Legal entity responsible for the study

NKI-AVL - Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

Roche/Genentech & the imCORE network.

Disclosure

P.G.M. de Gooyer: Other, Personal, Other, Partner works at MSD: MSD. M. Chalabi: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: BMS, BMS, Roche Genentech, Roche Genentech, MSD, Agenus; Non-Financial Interests, Advisory Role, Advisory Board: BMS, BMS, MSD; Non-Financial Interests, Advisory Role: Kineta. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.