Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

406P - Neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Date

27 Jun 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Xinyi Wang

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_1): S162-S204. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1482

Authors

X. Wang1, M. Fang2, Y. Jiang2, K. Tao2, Y. Ji2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou/CN
  • 2 Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou/CN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 406P

Background

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by esophagectomy is the standard treatment for locally advanced esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (LA-ESCC). However, it is unclear whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy (nCIT) further improves survival compared to nCRT.

Methods

Clinical data of patients who received nCIT or nCRT followed by esophagectomy for LA-ESCC between January 2010 and December 2022 were retrospectively collected from Zhejiang Cancer Hospital. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), secondary endpoints were clinicopathologic response, disease-free survival (DFS) and recurrence patterns. Treatment outcomes were compared between the two groups using univariate and multivariate Cox-regression analyses based on propensity score matching for baseline characteristics.

Results

A total of 625 patients were enrolled (470 in nCIT group and 155 in nCRT group). After two-to-one propensity score matching, 358 patients were included for analysis. The nCIT group had higher 3-year OS rate (77.6% vs. 62.2%, p=0.002) and 3-year DFS rate (69.4% vs. 53.5%, p=0.003) than nCRT group. After adjusting for other confounders in the multivariate analysis, nCIT remained a significantly favorable factor for both OS (HR 0.564, 95%CI 0.351-0.906, p=0.018) and DFS (HR 0.479, 95%CI 0.328-0.699, p<0.001). 93.7% of patients in the nCIT group achieved R0 resection compared to 94.1% in the nCRT group (p=0.893); pathologic complete response (pCR) rate was reported in 17.0% versus 38.5% (p<0.001) of patients, respectively. The major recurrence pattern was locoregional recurrence (12.3%) in the nCIT group, while distant metastasis (17.3%) in the nCRT group. Patients in the nCRT group were more likely to developing distant relapse (17.3% vs. 5.7%, p<0.001).

Conclusions

This retrospective analysis suggests that nCIT may improve OS and DFS over nCRT in LA-ESCC, even with lower rate of pCR, and prospective studies are needed to further confirm its efficacy.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Medical Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang Province (No. 2021KY542).

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.