Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

114P - Molecular alterations in a population-based metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) cohort

Date

27 Jun 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Emerik Österlund

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_1): S1-S74. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1477

Authors

E. Österlund1, K. Hammarström2, L. Nunes3, L. Mathot2, A. Mezheyeuski4, T. Sjöblom2, B. Glimelius5

Author affiliations

  • 1 Mehiläinen Länsi-Pohja Central Hospital, Kemi/FI
  • 2 Uppsala University, Uppsala/SE
  • 3 Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo/NO
  • 4 Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona/ES
  • 5 Akademiska Sjukhuset Uppsala, Uppsala/SE

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 114P

Background

RAS and BRAF mutations (mt) are predictive and prognostic in mCRC, whereas other genes have not been studied as thoroughly; the aim was to study these in a population-based mCRC cohort.

Methods

The cohort included all 765 patients in the Uppsala region in Sweden with a mCRC diagnosis 2010-2020. Molecular testing was done using a next-generation sequencing panel (OncomineTM Tumor Mutation Load Assay) including 409 cancer genes. Genes with a mutation frequency of ≥5% and NRAS were included in the analyses.

Results

Molecular testing was done in 396 patients, their median age was 71 years, primary location was right colon in 37%, left colon in 25%, and rectum in 38%. Incidence of genes included in further analyses, divided by primary tumour location, are shown in the table. The most frequently mutated genes were APC, KRAS, TP53, and BRAF. Mutations in BRAF, PIK3CA, SYNE1, and CSMD3were more common in right colon, whereas TP53 and APC were mutated more often in left colon and rectum. A worse prognosis was seen for those with BRAFmt (median overall survival [mOS] 19.8 vs 5.9 months, p<0.001) and ARID1Amt (mOS 15.1 vs 4.3 months, p=0.017), whereas no other mutations were prognostic. Both remained statistically significant in a multivariable model adjusting for age, primary tumour location, number of metastatic sites, performance status, and treatment; hazard ratio 1.90 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.40-2.6) for BRAFmt and 1.96 (95% CI 1.17-3.30) for ARID1Amt. ARID1Amt were more common among BRAFmt (11% vs 3%, p=0.003), and deficient mismatch repair (11% vs 1%, p=0.005). ARID1Amt patients were older (median 75 vs 70 years, p=0.015), and had a trend for worse performance status (ECOG 2-4 in 56% vs 34%, p=0.080) compared with ARID1A wildtype, whereas no differences were seen for sex, tumour grade, presentation of metastases, or metastatic sites. Table: 114P

Total Right colon Left colon Rectum p-value
Total 396 100% 145 100% 99 100% 151 100%
KRAS 170 43% 58 40% 38 38% 74 49% 0.164
NRAS 16 4% 2 1% 4 4% 10 7% 0.073
BRAF 75 19% 46 32% 16 16% 13 9% <0.001
TP53 222 56% 68 47% 61 62% 93 62% 0.018
APC 168 42% 45 31% 47 47% 76 50% 0.002
SMAD4 62 16% 22 15% 19 19% 21 14% 0.520
PIK3CA 52 13% 27 19% 12 12% 13 9% 0.037
FBXW7 32 8% 13 9% 5 5% 14 9% 0.436
SYNE1 32 8% 17 12% 9 9% 6 4% 0.046
CSMD3 30 8% 20 14% 3 3% 7 5% 0.002
LRP1B 26 7% 13 9% 7 7% 6 4% 0.218
ATM 25 6% 13 9% 4 4% 8 5% 0.241
AMER1 22 6% 8 6% 7 7% 7 5% 0.713
ARID1A 18 5% 7 5% 2 2% 9 6% 0.337

∗1 with unknown primary tumour not presented separately

Conclusions

The mutation frequency of BRAF, PIK3CA, SYNE1, CSMD3, TP53, and APC differ per primary tumour location. Only BRAFmt and ARID1Amt confer a worse prognosis.

Clinical trial identification

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Uppsala University (2009-408, 2010-198, 2011-092, 2012-224, 2015-419, 2018-490).

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors/Uppsala University.

Funding

This work was funded by grants from the Swedish Cancer Society, Lions Cancerforskningsfond Mellansverige, and an unrestricted start-up grant from Amgen.

Disclosure

E. Osterlund: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Amgen; Financial Interests, Personal, Training, Travel expenses: Nordic Drugs, Merck KGaA. L. Nunes: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Oncodia AB. T. Sjöblom: Financial Interests, Personal, Ownership Interest: Oncodia AB. B. Glimelius: Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding, Unrestricted grant: Amgen. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.