Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

361P - Modified FOLFIRINOX as second-line therapy in 140 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients who have failed first-line treatment using gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel

Date

27 Jun 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Dermot Farrell

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_1): S119-S161. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1481

Authors

D. Farrell1, S. Fitzgerald2, A. Daly1, B. Knox1, J. Divilly1, M. Robinson1, L. Gallagher1, P. Burke1, A. Dean1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Saint John of God Subiaco Hospital, Subiaco/AU
  • 2 Beaumont Hospital, Dublin/IE

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 361P

Background

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) first-line treatment has involved FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine with nab-paclitaxel; the latter being more favoured due to toxicity profile. The evidence base from the ACCORD study for the utility of FOLFIRINOX relied on a relatively young, non-frail cohort. Modified oxaliplatin, irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (m-FOLFIRINOX) has been shown to be tolerable in patients with ECOG 0-1 and less than 75 years old. The lack of data supportive of second-line chemotherapy choice is a challenge for clinicians, particularly in the elderly. We have previously reported on the use of m-FOLFIRINOX on 128 patients with PDAC without observed decreased efficacy or increase in adverse events.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis using an electronic database of patients with locally advanced or metastatic PDAC who received second-line m-FOLFIRINOX between January 2013 and March 2023, with outcomes followed to March 2024. All patients had an ECOG performance status of 2 or less. Overall survival (OS) was calculated via the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

140 patients were included in our analysis with 60% of these having metastatic disease at diagnosis. The median age of our study cohort was 63 years (range, 34 -85 years). The dosage of m-FOLFIRINOX was: 65% for oxaliplatin, 68% for irinotecan, 18% for bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and 68% for infusional 5-FU. Median OS was 20 months (95% CI, 17-23) with a range of 4-107 months. Within the metastatic cohort OS was 19 months (95% CI, 16-22). Within the locally advanced cohort OS was 28 months (95% CI, 22-34). The vast majority (98.5%) received gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel as part of first-line regimen. Median maintained time on second line m-FOLFIRINOX was 4 months, with a range of 1-47 months.

Conclusions

This retrospective analysis of 140 patients in Western Australia - the largest reported series of mFOLFIRINOX as demonstrates the safety and efficacy of m-FOLFIRINOX as second-line agent following failure of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in populations with locally advanced or metastatic PDAC. Formal phase three trials are required to further support our hypothesis.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

A. Dean: Financial Interests, Invited Speaker, Speakers' Bureau: Juniper Biologics; Financial Interests, Other, Travel, accommodation, expenses: Servier. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.