Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

342P - Is there still a role for consolidation radiotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer?

Date

27 Jun 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Loic Ah-thiane

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_1): S119-S161. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1481

Authors

L. Ah-thiane1, J. Serrand2, C. Berthet3, P. Lemoine Gobert4, P. Trémolières5, V. Guimas1, S. Supiot1, E. Rio1

Author affiliations

  • 1 ICO Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain/FR
  • 2 Center Leon Berard, Lyon/FR
  • 3 Centre Eugene - Marquis, Rennes/FR
  • 4 Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille/FR
  • 5 ICO - Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest - Site Paul Papin, 49055 - Angers/FR

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 342P

Background

Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) presents a dismal prognosis due to its unresectability and limited treatment options. Chemotherapy (CT) is the validated treatment, but the role of consolidation radiotherapy (RT) remains debated. We evaluated the oncological outcomes of patients with LAPC treated with RT after induction CT.

Methods

In this multicenter retrospective study, we included 164 patients with LAPC treated with induction CT followed by consolidation RT between 2010 and 2020. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), local control, distant metastases, resection rate, and treatment-related toxicities.

Results

Median OS was 20 months, with 1-year and 2-year OS rates of 85.6% and 33.0%, respectively. OS was significantly better in patients those who underwent surgical resection (p=0.002), but with no difference between FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine induction (p=0.32). Radiologic (RECIST criteria) and biologic (CA19-9) responses after induction CT could not predict RT benefits (p=0.06 and 0.69, respectively). Median PFS was 13.2 months. Local recurrence and distant metastases rates at 2 years were 42.7% and 65.2%, respectively. Surgical resection was achieved in 11.6% of patients, with a majority of R0 resection. RT was safe, with no grade 4 and few grade 3 toxicities.

Conclusions

This multicenter study was one of the largest cohorts reported to underscore some potential benefits in OS and PFS of consolidation RT for LAPC, with comparable outcomes between FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine regimens. It highlighted the importance of surgical resection in improving survival, and the current lack of biomarker to predict patients’ outcomes. RT was well-tolerated, with mainly mild toxicity. This study confirmed the results of the previously published smaller studies, both retrospective and prospective.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.