Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

50P - Is liver transplantation a treatment option for unresectable colorectal liver metastases? Interim analysis of a phase II trial

Date

27 Jun 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Zhihao Li

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_1): S1-S74. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1477

Authors

L. Rajendran1, C.T.J. Magyar1, Z. Li2, E. Winter2, M. Cattral3, B.A. Sayed3, A. Ghanekar3, N. Selzner3, R. Burkes4, G. Sapisochin1

Author affiliations

  • 1 University Health Network - Toronto General Hospital (TGH), Toronto/CA
  • 2 University Health Network - Toronto General Hospital Research Institute (TGHRI), Toronto/CA
  • 3 University Health Network, Toronto/CA
  • 4 Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto/CA

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 50P

Background

Patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), without extrahepatic disease, receiving palliative therapy have a 5-year overall survival (OS) of 5-8%. In this population, liver transplantation (LT) may be a viable curative option. Recent trials with strict patient selection and chemotherapy regimens have demonstrated excellent outcomes with deceased donor grafts. Living donor LT (LDLT) may be a more favourable option, by circumventing organ shortage and facilitating timely pre-transplant oncologic therapy. This study aims to assess the role of LDLT in treatment of unresectable CRLM.

Methods

Adults with unresectable, liver-only CRLM were recruited in a single-center open-label prospective phase II trial. Patients who had systemic chemotherapy for ≥6 months, with radiologic and biochemical stability on re-staging, and had no evidence of disease on operative portal lymph sampling met candidacy for LDLT. Characteristics and outcomes of transplanted patients in our interim trial analysis are described.

Results

Between October 2016 and April 2024, twelve patients received LDLT (Table). Ten patients received preoperative chemotherapy combined with anti-VEGF (bevacizumab) or anti-EGFR (panitumumab). Four patients additionally received hepatic artery infusion pump (HAIP). All tumors were BRAFV600E wild-type, and two patients had a KRAS mutation. Pre-transplant Oslo score was low (≤2). Median follow-up post-LDLT was 21.1 months (IQR 7.3, 27.9) Two patients died at 39.4 (due to disease recurrence) and 53.7 (unknown cause) months. The recurrence rate was 25%, with one at 12.4 months (abdominal nodes), and two to the lung (3.3 months and 7.3 months). All patients with recurrences received systemic chemotherapy. Table: 50P

Summary of patients that underwent LDLT

Chemo, # cycles pre-LT HAIP RAS mutant Primary tumour location Recurrence site, time (months) Oslo score Post-LT follow-up (months)
1 FOLFIRI/Panitumumab, 25 N N Left Abdo nodes, 12.4 2 26.4
2 FOLFIRI/Bevacizumab, 60 Y Y Left N 1 30.9
3 FOLFIRINOX/Panitumumab, 21 Y N Left N 1 26.9
4 FOLFIRI/Panitumumab, 20 N N Rectal N 0 25.5
5 FOLFIRI/Bevacizumab, 30 N N Right Lung, 3.3 1 39.4 DECEASED
6 FOLFIRI/Bevacizumab, 32 Y N Left N 1 53.7 DECEASED
7 FOLFOX, 32 N N Left N 0 16.7
8 FOLFIRI/ Bevacizumab, 16 N N Rectal N 1 12.8
9 FOLFIRI/Bevacizumab, 29 N Left N 2 7.1
10 FOLFIRI/Panitumumab/Bevacizumab, 54 N Y Left Lung, 7.3 0 7.3
11 FOLFIRI/Panitumumab, 31 Y N Left N 0 4.3
12 Capecitabine/Irinotecan/Bevacizumab, 30 N Left N 0 0.8

Conclusions

The interim analysis of this phase II trial demonstrates encouraging outcomes of LDLT for patients with liver-only CRLM. Further analysis is needed to confirm utility of LDLT in this population.

Clinical trial identification

NCT02864485.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

G. Sapisochin: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, Grant and for talks, consultancy: Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker, consultancy: AstraZeneca, Integra. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.