Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

261P - Evaluating tumor regression grade in locally advanced rectal cancer: Identifying predictive factors and clinical implications following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

Date

27 Jun 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Arpit Jain

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_1): S106-S118. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1480

Authors

A. Jain1, V. Goyal2, S. Soni3, S. Narayan4, P. Redhu1, S.S. Mathighatta Shivarudraiah1, P. Goyal1, S. Goyal1, U. Batra1, V. Talwar1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi/IN
  • 2 Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, New Delhi/IN
  • 3 MGMCH - Mahatma Gandhi Medical College & Hospital, 110085 - Jaipur/IN
  • 4 Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, 342005 - New Delhi/IN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 261P

Background

Accurate assessment of tumor regression grade (TRG) following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is crucial for predicting prognosis and guiding treatment strategies in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). This study aimed to investigate the relationship between TRG, clinical factors, and patient outcomes after nCRT.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with 129 LARC patients who underwent nCRT followed by surgery at a single tertiary care center from January 2019 to December 2022. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment variables, and histopathological data were collected. The grade of TRG was based on the extent of primary tumor replaced by fibrosis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors influencing TRG and its association with disease-free survival (DFS).

Results

Of the 129 eligible patients, median follow-up time was 24 months, among whom 29 patients (22.48%) achieved TRG0, whereas 22 patients (17.05%) showed TRG3. TRG1 and TRG2 were both found in 37 patients (28.7%). Clinicopathologic factors that were related to TRG included baseline carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level (P=0.001), clinical T stage (P=0.039), pathologic T stage (P<0.001) and pathologic lymph node status (P=0.002). In multivariable analyses, TRG remained an independent predictor of DFS (HR = 0.52; p < 0.043).

Conclusions

TRG serves as a valuable prognostic indicator in LARC patients post-nCRT. Understanding the factors influencing TRG can aid in optimizing treatment strategies and predicting patient outcomes. Further prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings and refine TRG assessment in clinical practice.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.