Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

203P - Etiology as a prognostic factor for survival in hepatocellular carcinoma in Latin American population

Date

27 Jun 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Stefan Zilli Hernández

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_1): S75-S93. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1478

Authors

S. Zilli Hernández1, G. Calderillo Ruiz1, B. Carbajal1, M. Herrera1, E. Ruiz1, S.M. Miyagui Adame1, D.L. Guerra Figueroa2, E. Garcia Garcia1

Author affiliations

  • 1 INCAN - Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Ciudad de Mexico/MX
  • 2 UNAM - Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Ciudad de Mexico/MX

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 203P

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death worldwide. Certain etiologies such as hepatotropic viruses, alcohol, and metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) contribute to the incidence of HCC. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of etiology on overall survival in Latin-American patients with HCC.

Methods

Retrospective, observational study. Included patients with HCC treated at the National Cancer Institute between 2008-2021. Statistical analysis: X2 and t-test, Kaplan Meier, Log Rank, and Cox Regression. Statistical significance differences were assessed when p was bilaterally <0.05.

Results

89 patients with HCC were included. Most of the patients were male (n=60, 67.4) with a median age of 66 years (17 - 87), according to etiology, MAFLD represents 61.8% (n=55) and non-MAFLD 38.2% (n=34) (alcoholic 24.7%, viral associated 12.4% and other 1.1%). Ultrasound-guided percutaneous biopsy was performed in 77.5% (n=69) for diagnosis and the histological subtype was poorly differentiated carcinoma (n=45, 50.6%). Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 1 represents 79.8% (n=71), CHILD-PUGH A5 represents 57.3% (n=51) and ALBI grade 2, 60.7% (n=54), Regarding treatment, 48.3% (n=43) of patients received sorafenib, which is the most common line of treatment. An OS analysis was performed considering etiology, patients with MAFLD reported a median OS of 32 months versus 16 months for non-MAFLD (p=0.012, HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.10-0.70). Besides, a subanalysis was performed considering only patients treated with sorafenib, comparing etiology, MAFLD patients reported a median OS of 35 months versus 16 months for non-MAFLD (p=0.071, HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.42-1.53). At Cox Regression analysis, MAFLD etiology remained as predictor factor of OS, (HR: 0.45; 95% Cl 0.23-0.86 p=0.019).

Conclusions

MAFLD has been identified as an independent prognostic factor for overall survival in patients with HCC. Moreover, a clinical tendency of a better OS was observed for patients treated with sorafenib. Thereby suggesting the role of the etiology in the selection of patients for tyrosine kinase treatment. Sorafenib may be a suitable agent for patients with MAFLD-HCC.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.