Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

306P - Comparison of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus first-line systemic chemotherapy for advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A real-world retrospective study

Date

27 Jun 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Zhenyun Yang

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_1): S119-S161. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1481

Authors

Z. Yang1, D. Hu2, M. Chen3

Author affiliations

  • 1 State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou/CN
  • 2 Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, 510060 - Guangzhou/CN
  • 3 Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou/CN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 306P

Background

Systemic chemotherapy (SC) has stood as the only first-line treatment for advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) over the past few decades. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been proved to provide additional benefit in disease control. However, oncological outcome of iCCA remains poor and awaits further improvement with new treatment modalities. Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab (Len-P) showed promising results as second line in iCCA. Consequently, our study sought to explore the safety and efficacy of Len-P as a first-line therapy for iCCA patients within real-world clinical practice.

Methods

We retrospectively enrolled 133 advanced iCCA patients who received Len-P or SC between May 2019 and May 2023. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease-control rate (DCR) and adverse events (AEs) were compared between the two groups.

Results

There were 72 patients and 61 patients in the Len-P group and SC group, respectively. The median OS for the Len-P and SC groups was 16.3 and 17.8 months, respectively. Meanwhile, the median PFS times for the Len-P and SC groups was 8.9 and 11.4 months, respectively. There was no significant difference in ORR and DCR between the Len-P and SC group (ORR: 22.2% vs 23%; P = 0.92; DCR: 69.4% vs 77%; P = 0.58). In addition, the overall incidence of AEs was lower in the Len-P group than SC group. Low inflammation-based scores were indicative of favorable prognoses in patients undergoing Len-P.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that the effect of Len-P is comparable to SC as first-line therapy for patients with advanced iCCA, with highly improved safety. It emerges as a viable treatment alternative for advanced iCCA. Inflammation-based scores show potential utility in identifying individuals likely to derive heightened benefits from Len-P therapy.

Legal entity responsible for the study

Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.