Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

256P - Comparison of endoscopic and imaging surveillance for early rectal cancer during watch and wait

Date

27 Jun 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Jo Ann Wong

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_1): S106-S118. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1480

Authors

J.A. Wong1, A.S. Dhadda2, I. Hunter2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Weston Park Hospital - Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield/GB
  • 2 Castle Hill Hospital - Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Cottingham/GB

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 256P

Background

Organ preservation is an increasingly popular concept for the treatment of early rectal cancer. Contact x-ray brachytherapy (CXB) has been shown to achieve high rates of complete clinical response (cCR) and is an attractive option for patients who are stoma averse or unfit. However, there is little information on the optimal frequency and accuracy of endoscopic and imaging surveillance for patients who enter watch and wait following CXB. The current standard is 3 monthly endoscopy and imaging for 2 years and 6 monthly thereafter which is resource intensive.

Methods

All patients treated at the Queen’s Centre for Oncology, Hull between November 2011 and September 2023 with CXB either as primary or adjuvant therapy for rectal cancer were identified. Demographics, imaging and endoscopic results and clinic outcomes were collected from patients’ medical records.

Results

A total of 237 patients successfully completed CXB during the study period; 165 patients underwent CXB as primary rectal cancer treatment, and 72 patients had CXB as adjuvant therapy following local excision (see table). Five patients in the primary treatment group were excluded due to failure to achieve cCR. The overall median follow-up was 30.5 months. In the primary CXB group, there were 30 (18%) local recurrences and 6 (6/72, 8%) in those who had adjuvant CXB. 97% (35/36) of the local recurrences were luminal and were accurately identified on endoscopy. MRI/CT of pelvis only picked up 61% (22/36) of the local recurrences and had a false negative rate of 25%. There was 1 (1/232, 0.4%) mesorectal nodal recurrence. There were 23 (23/232, 10%) distant recurrences.

Conclusions

The majority of local recurrences seen during watch and wait are luminal rather than nodal. Endoscopy is superior at detecting luminal recurrence than imaging. The frequency of MRI imaging during watch and wait could be reduced as a result.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.