Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

281P - Comparison of efficacy & safety of two frontline cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens in newly diagnosed metastatic cancer of biliary tract: A randomized control study

Date

27 Jun 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

nishant sinha

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_1): S119-S161. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1481

Authors

N. sinha1, J. Porwal2, D. SUNDRIYAL1, S. Gupta3, U. Chauhan1, A. Gupta1

Author affiliations

  • 1 AIIMS - All India Institute of Medical Science Rishikesh, Rishikesh/IN
  • 2 All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh/IN
  • 3 AIIMS - All India Institute of Medical Science - Rishikesh, Rishikesh/IN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 281P

Background

Biliary tract cancers (BTC) are rare yet aggressive malignancies. Gemcitabine with either Cisplatin or Oxaliplatin constitutes the current standard therapy for metastatic BTC in LMIC. However, data comparing these regimens directly is scarce. Therefore, we conducted randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of these two frontline treatments.

Methods

This open-label, prospective study randomized patients with histology-proven metastatic BTC, aged >18 years, and ECOG PS≤3 into two arms. Arm-A received Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 plus Cisplatin 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, while Arm B received Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 with Oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 1 only, every 21 days. Radiological response evaluations were done after 4 cycles of therapy or at any evidence of clinical progression, whichever occurred earlier. Adverse events were documented according to CTCAE 5.0. Data analysis was performed using SPSS Statistics (Version 23.0).

Results

Among 210 screened patients, 52 eligible subjects were recruited from May 2022 to April 2023. The median overall survival (OS) was 7.6 months in the GemCis arm versus 5.7 months in the GemOx arm (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.64 to 2.29; P = 0.566). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.9 months in the GemCis arm versus 3.7 months in the GemOx arm (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.43 to 1.39; P = 0.392). The 6-month PFS rate was 18.5% in the GemCis arm versus 28.1% in the GemOx arm. The 6-month OS rate was 56.9% in the GemCis arm and 51.2% in the GemOx arm (P = 0.39). Treatment completion rate and toxicity profile favored the GemOx arm, with a higher incidence of peripheral neuropathy, fatigue, and grade 1/2 thrombocytopenia. The GemCis arm exhibited more grade 3 and higher hematological toxicity, infection, required more growth factor and blood product support, hospitalization and a poorer completion rate.

Conclusions

In conclusion, our trial found no significant difference in survival outcomes between GemCis and GemOx for metastatic BTC. However, GemOx exhibited a better toxicity profile and treatment completion rate. Further research is needed to confirm these findings in larger studies, especially the integration of immunotherapeutic options.

Clinical trial identification

CTRI/2023/07/054679.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.