Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

198P - Comparing clinical outcomes between PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors plus bevacizumab combined with hepatic arterial interventional therapies in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A single-center, real-world study

Date

27 Jun 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Yangxun Pan

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_1): S75-S93. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1478

Authors

Y. Pan1, Z. Yuan2, D. Hu1, M. Chen2, Z. Zhou2, Y. Zhang2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, 510060 - Guangzhou/CN
  • 2 Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou/CN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 198P

Background

Systemic therapies combined with locoregional therapies were considered a potent therapeutic strategy in treating patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). Given the bevacizumab plus atezolizumab strategy recommended as the first-line treatment for advanced HCC patients, the roles of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors in the combination therapies for treating patients with uHCC needed to be further discussed. The current study compared the clinical outcomes between PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors plus bevacizumab combined with hepatic arterial interventional therapies (HAIT) among patients with uHCC.

Methods

From October 2019 to May 2023, 142 uHCC patients who received HAIT combined with systemic therapies were retrospectively analyzed in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, including 74 or 68 patients treated with either PD-1 (PD-1 group) or PD-L1 (PD-L1 group) inhibitors combined with HAIT plus bevacizumab. The progression-free survival (PFS) and tumor responses were analyzed per RECIST criteria.

Results

At the data cut-off, the median PFS was 5.5 months in the PD-1 group and 7.5 months in the PD-L1 group, respectively (P=0.280). The PD-L1 group showed a significantly better median intrahepatic PFS (8.1 months, 95%CI 7.6-10.2 months) than the PD-1 group (6.5 months, 95%CI 6.2-9.0 months; P=0.014). Moreover, the PD-L1 group demonstrated a significantly higher intrahepatic response rate (60.2% vs. 35.1%, P=0.005) than the PD-1 group according to RECIST criteria. The treatment-related adverse events were similar between the two groups.

Conclusions

PD-1 or PD-L1 plus bevacizumab combined with HAIT shared similar overall PFS in treating uHCC patients. However, the PD-L1 plus bevacizumab combined with HAIT demonstrated better intrahepatic PFS and intrahepatic control rate than those of PD-1, which needed further validation at a higher evidence level.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.