Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

444P - Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of HER2-low advanced/metastatic gastric cancer

Date

27 Jun 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Wendy Chan

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_1): S162-S204. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1482

Authors

W.W.L. Chan1, H. Hou1, R. Liu2, K.O. Lam1, P.Y.R. Tse2, E. Cheung1, I. Wong1, S. Law1, D.L.W. Kwong1

Author affiliations

  • 1 The University of Hong Kong - Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, Hong Kong/HK
  • 2 Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong/HK

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 444P

Background

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low expression, defined as immunohistochemistry (IHC) 1+ or IHC 2+, and in situ hybridization (ISH) negative, in advanced or metastatic gastric cancer (mGC) has been recognized as a new therapeutic biomarker. However, the distinct nature of HER2-low mGC remains controversial. This retrospective study compares clinicopathological features, treatment response, and survival outcomes between HER2-low and HER2-IHC 0 mGC in a real-world setting.

Methods

Data from consecutive patients with HER2-low or HER2-IHC 0 mGC receiving first-line systemic chemotherapy at Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong from January 2017 to December 2021 were analyzed. Patient characteristics, HER2 status, metastatic sites, overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank test, and cox regression.

Results

A total of 229 patients (male: 127, 55.5%; median age: 63, range: 26-86) were included. 137 (59.8%) were classified as HER2-low (HER2 score 1: 113, 49.3%; HER2 score 2: 24, 10.5%) and 92 (40.2%) classified as HER2-IHC 0 mGC. The incidences of liver (HER2-low vs. HER2-IHC 0 23.9% vs. 19.7%, p=0.50), peritoneal (60.9% vs. 67.9%, p=0.52) and distant lymph node metastasis (14.1% vs. 19.8%, p=0.91) were comparable between HER2-low and HER2-IHC 0. The ORR of first-line chemotherapy was 23.1%, with no significant difference between HER2-IHC 0 and HER2-low. Median PFS showed no significant difference (16.5 weeks vs. 19.9 weeks, p=0.19). Similar proportions of patients received second-line treatment (48.9% vs. 48.2%, p=0.93), indicating no significant difference. Median OS did not significantly differ between HER2-IHC 0 and HER2-low tumors (48.6 weeks vs. 56.1 weeks, p=0.52).

Conclusions

Contrary to some studies suggesting HER2-low as a distinct entity, our real-world analysis indicates that HER2-low mGC shares similarities with HER2-IHC 0 in terms of clinical characteristics, chemotherapy response, and prognosis. Further prospective studies focusing on biomarkers and effective treatments for mGC are needed.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.