Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

18P - Clinical outcomes in pT4N0 colon cancer (CC) patients: Data from a large, multicenter, real-word cohort

Date

27 Jun 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Valentina Daprà

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_1): S1-S74. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1477

Authors

V. Daprà1, D. Rossini2, A. Puccini3, F. Schietroma4, A. Cosmai4, L. DiFrancesco4, F. Zoratto5, M. Costantini5, V. Formica6, M. Rofei6, G. Mauri7, E.F. Bonazzina8, M. Iaia9, C. Signorelli10, L. Antonuzzo11, C. Damonte12, A. Spinelli13, G. Tortora14, A. Santoro15, L. Salvatore14

Author affiliations

  • 1 Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano/IT
  • 2 University of Florence, Florence/IT
  • 3 IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano/IT
  • 4 Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli–IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome/IT
  • 5 Ospedale Santa Maria Goretti - ASL Latina, Latina/IT
  • 6 Policlinico Tor Vergata, Rome/IT
  • 7 Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan/IT
  • 8 ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan/IT
  • 9 Tricase City Hospital, Tricase/IT
  • 10 Medical Oncology Unit, Belcolle Hospital, ASL Viterbo, Viterbo/IT
  • 11 AOUC - Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Firenze/IT
  • 12 Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy, Milan/IT
  • 13 Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele/IT
  • 14 Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome/IT
  • 15 Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano/IT

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 18P

Background

T4 is one of the most important and independent prognostic factors in adjuvant setting for CC patients. However, the optimal management in stage II (pT4N0) as well as the impact of DNA mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) in this subset of patients remain unclear. Here, we present a large, multicenter, real-world analysis of pT4N0 CC patients.

Methods

A real-world database including pts treated at 9 Italian institutions from April 2010 to November 2023 was queried. Clinico-pathological characteristics of pts diagnosed with a stage II pT4N0 CC were analyzed. Pts were stratified according to duration of treatment, DNA mismatch repair (MMR) status, type of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT). Primary endpoints were median relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

A total of 382 pts was included, and outcomes data were available for 306 pts. Median age 72 yrs, 51% male. 51 pts (23%) had dMMR CC; Lynch Syndrome was found in 15% of them. After a median follow-up of 48.6 mo (40.7-50.4), 3-yr RFS and 5-yr RFS were 67% and 53%, respectively; 3-yr OS was 81% and 5-yr OS 68%. 160 pts (52%) received ACT: oxaliplatin (oxa)-based CT was given to 107 pts (67%). 6-mo ACT was given to 37 pts (71%) and 77 pts (72%) in the monotherapy and oxa-based group, respectively. Pts receiving 6-mo ACT had a significant longer OS compared to those who did not (HR 0.19; 0.10-0.35; p <.001). A trend towards improved OS was observed in 6-mo vs 3-mo ACT (HR 0.45; 0.19-1.06; p 0.060). Similar results were observed in terms of RFS: 6-mo ACT showed a longer RFS compared to 3-mo ACT (HR 0.57; 0.32-1.00; p .047) and to no-ACT (HR 0.45; 0.30-0.68; p <.001). Oxa-based ACT was associated with a significant improvement in OS compared to monotherapy (HR 0.21; 0.09-0.52; p <.001). Overall, pts with dMMR CC did not show a statistically significant difference in terms of OS (p .23), while RFS was significantly longer (HR 0.57; 0.33-1.00; p .047) compared to proficient pts.

Conclusions

In this large real-world dataset, T4 was confirmed as a poor prognostic factor, independently to MMR status. ACT provides large benefit in this population, and oxa-based ACT may be better than monotherapy. In addition, 6-mo oxa-based ACT showed a trend towards a better outcome compared to 3-mo ACT.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.