Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

104P - A real-world study: Efficacy of the third-line therapy of standard therapy versus rechallenge-chemotherapy in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer

Date

27 Jun 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Xifeng Xu

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_1): S1-S74. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1477

Authors

X. Xu1, J. fu2, H. Xu1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Jinhua Central Hospital, Jinhua/CN
  • 2 Jinhua Central Hospital, 321000 - Jinhua/CN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 104P

Background

Third-line treatment options are limited in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Fruquintinib, regorafenib and trifluridine–tipiracilare usually used as third-line treatmentsin chemotherapy-refractory mCRC.Recently, we found that the rechallenge-chemotherapy showed good efficacy in third-line therapy of mCRC. However, there is currently a lack of head-to-head comparison between the aforementioned drugs. Herein, the aim of this study is to review the efficacy of standard therapy versus rechallenge-chemotherapy in the real world.

Methods

We identified 107 eligible patients with mCRC who received third-line therapy in our hospital. All statistical analyses were performed using RStudio version 3.5.2. Time-to-event analysis was plotted on Kaplan-Meier curves, and hazard ratio was calculated using Cox regression. The spider and waterfall plots were used to compare the curative effect between the two groups according to RECIST 1.1. In all analyses, a P value of < 0.05 was considered to indicate a significant difference.

Results

From April 17, 2018 to June 7, 2023,a total of 107 mCRC patients (68 males and 39 females) were retrospectively enrolled in the study, with a median follow-up time of 6.6 (range, 0.4–37.2) months.54 patients received standard therapy and 53 patients received chemotherapy rechallenge. The median overall survival (OS) was 6.6 months (95% CI, 5.3 to 10.9 months) in standard group and 16.6 months (95% CI, 11.5 to 32.6 months) in rechallenge group. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.9 months(95% CI, 2.4 to 4.2 months) in standard group and 5.2months(95% CI, 4.3 to 6.9 months) in rechallenge group.The objective response rate(ORR)and disease control rate (DCR) was 9.4%(5/53) /66%(35/53) and 1.8%(1/54)/40.7%(22/54) in the chemotherapy rechallenge group and standard therapy group, respectively.

Conclusions

Among patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer in the third-line therapy, the rechallenge-chemotherapy resulted in longer overall survival than the standard therapy indicating a new treatment strategy.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.