Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

469P - 16-year outcomes of radically treated localized gastric cancer (GC) patients (pt): Real-world data (RWD) of a Spanish institution

Date

27 Jun 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Ismael Macias Declara

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_1): S162-S204. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1482

Authors

I. Macias Declara1, S. Soriano2, P. Ribera Fernandez1, R. Querol Ninerola2, S. Navarro2, F. Rivera Herrero3, C. Hierro Carbo4, A.L. Luna2, N. Perez Romero2, T. Sauri Nadal5, M.A. Segui Palmer2, C. Pericay Pijaume6

Author affiliations

  • 1 Parc Tauli Hospital Universitari, Sabadell/ES
  • 2 Hospital Universitario Parc Taulí, Sabadell/ES
  • 3 HUMV - Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla, Santander/ES
  • 4 Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO- Badalona) Germans Trias i Pujol University Hospital, Badalona/ES
  • 5 Hospital Clinic y Provincial de Barcelona, Barcelona/ES
  • 6 Hospital Mutua de Terrassa, Terrassa/ES

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 469P

Background

GC is the third most common cause of cancer death worldwide. Surgery is the treatment of choice. The effectiveness of adjuvant or perioperative treatments is increasingly improving. Although the best treatment sequence for localized GC (LGC) has not clearly been established, the perioperative regimen with 5-fluorouracil (5FU)/leucovorin/oxaliplatin/docetaxel [FLOT] is currently the gold standard in Western countries.

Methods

Single-center retrospective study, of pt with LGC treated with surgery at Hospital Parc Taulí from 2004 to 2020. Data regarding demographic characteristics, treatment and survival outcomes were collected. Data analysis was performed using SPSS program. The primary end point was median overall survival (mOS) based on the type of complementary treatment recived. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used for mOS analysis and the log-rank test to detect differences.

Results

The study included 266 pt. Mean age at diagnosis was 68 years. Tumors located in the gastroesophageal junction (Siewert I/II) were not included. 52.6% pts underwent surgery alone, 6% surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) (5FU/LV)/radiotherapy (CRT), 18.8% adjuvant CT (4.5% capecitabine/oxaliplatin (CAPOX) and 18.8% mitomycin C/tegafur (MMC-T), and 22.5% received perioperative CT [13.5% docetaxel/cisplatin/5 fluorouracil/capecitabine (DCF/C) and 4.5% FLOT]. Overall mOS was 59 months (m) (95% CI 42.634 – 75.366). The mOS of pt who underwent surgery followed by CRT was 60 m, whilst those treated with adjuvant CT, either MMC-T or CAPOX, achieved mOS of 45 m and 32 m each. Perioperative strategies with DCF/C or FLOT resulted in mOS of 43 m and 45 m, respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed between the different subgroups according to the long-rank test (p-value 0.911).

Conclusions

Our cohort illustrates the substantial changes experienced in the last two decades for treating LGC in Spain. Despite the good results achieved with initial surgery and CRT, switching onto perioperative triplets with taxanes (DCF/C or FLOT) is now the treatment of choice. However, for pt resected upfront, we demonstrate that the regimen MMC-T is a feasible alternative to CAPOX and warrants further investigation.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.

  • Analytics cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage.

  • We use marketing cookies to build a profile of you as a user through your actions on our site in order to better understand your interests and provide you with pertinent suggestions.