Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 16

2352P - Sex-based differences in genomic alterations and biomarkers in anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC)

Date

21 Oct 2023

Session

Poster session 16

Topics

Cancer Biology;  Pathology/Molecular Biology;  Genetic and Genomic Testing

Tumour Site

Anal Cancer

Presenters

Stefano Cereda

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 34 (suppl_2): S1190-S1201. 10.1016/S0923-7534(23)01928-2

Authors

S. Cereda1, M. Ronzoni1, B. Kaplan2, J. Suh2, S. Sivakumar2, S. Foti1, M. Mariani1, N. Liscia1, F. Vitiello1, G. Basile3, M. Bandini3, E. Mazza1, A. Necchi1, S. Cascinu1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Oncology Department, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, 20132 - Milan/IT
  • 2 Biology, Foundation Medicine, Inc., 27560 - Morrisville/US
  • 3 Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, 20132 - Milan/IT

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 2352P

Background

ASCC is a relatively rare malignancy. Several studies reported favourable prognosis in Female to Male patients (pts).Our work aims to identify and quantify sex-based differences in cancer-associated genomic alterations to better inform future precision medicine initiatives and provide insights on potential different survival based on sex.

Methods

A cohort of 1,380 ASCC pts (952 F,428 M) underwent genomic profiling on tissue biopsies using FoundationOne®/FoundationOne®CDx assays, to examine key differences in mutational patterns based on sex and HPV status.

Results

HPV-16 was prevalent in F while HPV-6 in M. PD-L1 expression: over 70% positive (1%), ∼20% high (50%) with similar rates in HPV+ vs HPV- (74.5% vs 63.9%; p=0.16) and sex (F:74% vs M:70.4%; p=0.80). TMB-High (10+mutations/Mb) was found in ∼18% without significant differences by sex (p=0.80); a slightly elevated rate was seen in HPV+ vs HPV- (18.4% vs 14.0%; p=0.16); 34% had PIK3CA alterations (37.1% in HPV+ vs.16.8% in HPV- ; p<.01 with similar rates by sex F:37.1% vs 20.8%; M:37.1% vs 13.3%); in contrast higher prevalence in HPV- vs HPV+ resulted to TP53 (44.9% vs 5.6% p<.01), TERT(31.3% vs 2.7% p<.01), CDNK2A (29% vs 2.9%p<.01), CDNK2B (11.7% vs 1.6% p<.01) and NOTCH1 (14.5% vs 5.1% p<.01); F had higher rates of alterations in PTEN (15.3% vs 8.4%p<.01) ,KMT2D (21% vs 13.1%, p<.01), CBFB (3.3% vs 0.2%; p<.01) and CREBBP (5.4 vs 2.6%; p=0.06),whereas M showed higher rates of alterations in TERT(15.2 vs 3.5% p<.01), TP53 (20.3% vs 7.8% p<.01),CDKN2A (14% vs 3.8%p<.01),CDKN2B (5.4% vs 2.2% p=.02), MYC (4.2% vs 1.6% p=.03) as well as amplifications on 11q13 such as CCND1(7%vs3.2%p=0.02), FGF19 (7%vs3.3%p=0.02), FGF3(7.2%vs3.6%,p=0.02), FGF4 (7% vs 3.5% p=0.02). BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations were in 5% pts with mild M predominance (7% vs 4%) regardless HPV expression.

Conclusions

The higher incidence of HPV positivity in F compared to M remains the main hypothesis to justify the better prognosis of ASCC in women. A large proportion of PD-L1+ and TMB-High (∼70%), PIK3CA alterations (∼30%) and BRCA1/2 gene alteration (5%) may predict response to possible new therapeutic approaches for pts with ASCC like immunotherapy, targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors, platinum chemotherapy and PARP inhibitors.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.