Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 05

1278P - Update of the INSPIRE study: Iruplinalkib versus crizotinib in ALK TKI-naïve locally advanced or metastatic ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Date

14 Sep 2024

Session

Poster session 05

Topics

Targeted Therapy

Tumour Site

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Yuan-Kai Shi

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_2): S802-S877. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1602

Authors

J. Chen1, R. Yang2, H. Wu3, Z. Wang4, W. Yang5, J. Cui6, Y. Zhang7, C. Liu8, Y. Cheng9, Y. Liu10, J. Shan11, D. Wang12, L. Yang13, C. Hu14, M. Si15, H. Li16, L. Li16, X. Kang16, L. Wang17

Author affiliations

  • 1 Thoracic Medicine Department I, Hunan Tumor Hospital, 410013 - Changsha/CN
  • 2 The Second Department Of Medical Oncology, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, 650118 - Kunming/CN
  • 3 Respiratory Intervention Department, Henan Cancer Hospital, 450008 - Zhengzhou/CN
  • 4 Respiratory Medical Oncology Ward Ii, Shandong Cancer Hospital & Institute, 250117 - Jinan/CN
  • 5 Department Of Respiratory, Shanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital, 030013 - Taiyuan/CN
  • 6 Oncology Department, The First Hospital of Jilin University, 130021 - Changchun/CN
  • 7 Department Of Thoracic Medical Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, 310005 - Hangzhou/CN
  • 8 Pulmonary Medicine Ward Ii, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, 830000 - Urumqi/CN
  • 9 Thoracic Oncology Department, Jilin Cancer Hospital, 130000 - Changchun/CN
  • 10 Department Of Internal Medical Oncology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, 110002 - Shenyang/CN
  • 11 Oncology Department, Army Medical Center of PLA, Beijing/CN
  • 12 Department Of Internal Medical Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, 400000 - Chongqing/CN
  • 13 Department Of Respiratory Oncology, Gansu province Cancer Hospital, 730031 - Lanzhou/CN
  • 14 Ward 4 Of Department Of Oncology, Anhui Provincial Cancer Hospital, 230031 - Hefei/CN
  • 15 Clinical Research And Development Center, Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., 250100 - Jinan/CN
  • 16 Clinical Research And Development Center, Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., 250104 - Jinan/CN
  • 17 Department Of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing Key Laboratory of Clinical Study on Anticancer Molecular Targeted Drugs, Beijing/CN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1278P

Background

The first interim analysis of the phase 3 INSPIRE study (NCT04632758) (data cutoff: Nov 13, 2022) showed that iruplinalkib significantly improved PFS versus crizotinib in patients (pts) with advanced ALK+ and ALK TKI-naïve NSCLC. Here we present updated survival and safety results after additional follow-up.

Methods

Pts with ALK+, stage IIIB/IV NSCLC naïve to ALK TKI were randomized (1:1) to oral iruplinalkib 180 mg QD (7-day run-in at 60 mg QD) or crizotinib 250 mg BID. The primary endpoint was PFS assessed by Independent Review Committee (IRC) per the RECIST version 1.1. Secondary endpoints included PFS by investigator (INV), OS and safety.

Results

From Sep 4, 2019 to Dec 2, 2020, 292 pts were randomized (iruplinalkib/crizotinib, n=143/149). The data cutoff date of this updated analysis was Oct 25, 2023. Median follow-up for PFS by IRC was 35.02 months for iruplinalkib and 34.96 months for crizotinib. Median PFS by IRC was 36.80 months for iruplinalkib and 14.55 months for crizotinib (HR, 0.311 [98.02% CI, 0.222-0.436]; stratified one-sided log-rank p<0.0001). Other efficacy results are presented in the table. Incidence of ≥ grade 3 treatment-related AEs was 53.1% for iruplinalkib and 51.0% for crizotinib.

Conclusions

These results demonstrated iruplinalkib continued to improve PFS versus crizotinib in pts with advanced ALK+ and ALK TKI-naïve NSCLC. The safety profile was consistent with prior results and no new safety findings was observed. Table: 1278P

Updated survival results of iruplinalkib versus crizotinib

Iruplinalkib (n=143) Crizotinib (n=149)
mPFS by INV, mo (95% CI) 31.11 (23.98-38.60) 14.75 (11.10-16.56)
HR (95% CI) 0.423 (0.312-0.573)
mPFS in ALK+ pts by IRC, mo (95% CI) 45.90 (28.32-NE) 14.55 (11.07-16.53)
HR (95% CI) 0.292 (0.199-0.430)
mPFS in pts with baseline CNS metastases by IRC, mo (95% CI) 26.25 (18.27-NE) 11.01 (7.46-14.72)
HR (95% CI) 0.215 (0.103-0.449)
mPFS in pts without baseline CNS metastases by IRC, mo (95% CI) 45.90 (29.50-NE) 16.39 (12.88-18.30)
HR (95% CI) 0.330 (0.222-0.489)
36-mo OS rate (%) (95% CI) 81.3 (73.8-86.9) 75.8 (67.8-82.1)

Note: ALK+ pts were those whose ALK status was confirmed positive by both central laboratory and local hospitals.

Clinical trial identification

NCT04632758.

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

Funding

Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

Disclosure

M. Si, H. Li, L. Li, X. Kang: Other, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.