Abstract 427P
Background
ABC patients encounter numerous challenges that can impede their access to comprehensive care and the realization of their educational and treatment goals. PN effectively addresses barriers and improves personalized goal-concordant care. MD Anderson (MDA) Breast Center has a comprehensive PN program that integrates a multidisciplinary team to support over 1,800 active ABC patients, ensuring timely access to specialized care.We examined the outcomes of ABC patients in a navigation cohort, who received APRN-led PN services, with those in a non-navigation cohort.
Methods
In this gathered data from the electronic health record from June 2020 to June 2023, we examined ABC patients who received navigation (at least one visit n=393) versus those who did not (n=5061) during this time. Emergency care visits, Advanced Care Planning (ACP) based on follow-up time, Barriers to Care and Goals of Care were collected on structure intake forms adapted from other institutions as part of an ABC APRN led Navigation clinic at every visit referred by treating clinician or self and analyzed using descriptive statistics.
Results
In the navigation cohort, the median number of MDA emergency visits per year was 5, for 74 (18.8%) patients, compared to the median of 7 visits per year for 479 (9.5%) in the non-navigation group. Additionally, a higher proportion of navigation patients had power of attorney documentation (29.52%) and living wills (23.41%) compared to non-navigation patients (13.21% and 9.76%, respectively). Among patients who received navigation, they commonly faced challenges such as knowledge deficit (93%), coordination of care (89%), and financial concerns (23%). Their life goals often included prioritizing family time (41%) and maintaining quality of life (36%). In terms of treatment, they sought symptom management (25%) and coordinated care (9%).
Conclusions
Patients enrolled in the PN program had high supportive care needs leading to emergency visits and significant knowledge and coordination needs. The ABC program was associated with increased ACP towards promoting goal concordant care. Future models should focus on PN, not only improving access to care but also facilitates addressing specific barriers and aligning treatment plans.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
D. Hui: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consultant: Eton Pharmaceuticals; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Senior Associate Editor: Journal of Pain and Symptom Management; Non-Financial Interests, Member of Board of Directors: MASCC. D. Tripathy: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Serving on Steering Committee for TrialsEducational Lectures: Novartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Steering Committee for and ongoing trial: Pfizer; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Advisory council for design and interpretation of trials: GSK; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, Educational Lectures: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, To discuss and interpret clinical trial data: Immunomedics; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Advice on clinical trial design: OncoPep; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, Lecture on gene profiling: Exact Sciences; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Consulting: Sermonix; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Consultant: Personalis, Puma Biotechnology, Roche, AMBRX, BeiGene; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Consultant and service on Data Monitoring Committee: Gilead; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Steering Committee Member: Jazz Pharmaceuticals; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, Funding for laboratory experiments on the inhibition of CXCR4 in breast cancer cells: Polyphor; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI, Global PI on one trial and local PI on another trial: Novartis; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI, Payment to institution for clinical trial expenses: AMBRX. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
533P - First-line treatment in older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A large real-world study
Presenter: debora basile
Session: Poster session 15
534P - Second-line treatment in older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: The ELECTRA study
Presenter: Alessia Cordua
Session: Poster session 15
535P - Safety and efficacy of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors in elderly colorectal cancer patients: An Italian real-world multicenter experience
Presenter: Alessandra Boccaccino
Session: Poster session 15
536P - A randomized phase II/III trial comparing hepatectomy followed by mFOLFOX6 with hepatectomy alone for liver metastasis from colorectal cancer: Long-term results of JCOG0603
Presenter: Yukihide Kanemitsu
Session: Poster session 15
537P - Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy combined with fruquintinib and tislelizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer: Updated findings from a single-arm, prospective phase II trial (RIFLE)
Presenter: Yajiie Chen
Session: Poster session 15
538P - Combined hepatectomy with complete cytoreduction (CCS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) vs. HIPEC alone for metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Gabriele Lech
Session: Poster session 15
540P - Early treatment discontinuation (ETD) in dMMR/MSI-H metastastic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)
Presenter: Julien Taieb
Session: Poster session 15
541P - Nivolumab (NIVO) plus ipilimumab (IPI) vs chemotherapy (chemo) as first-line (1L) treatment for microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Subgroup efficacy and expanded safety analyses from CheckMate 8HW
Presenter: Thierry André
Session: Poster session 15