Abstract 2004P
Background
The aim of this study was to determine whether the combination of serum Cytokeratin fragment 21-1 (sCYFRA) and Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) scores has diagnostic and prognostic value in high-stage bladder cancer.
Methods
We performed 537 transurethral resections of bladder tumors at our hospital between January 2019 and August 2023, who underwent preoperative Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and measured post operative sCYFRA into this study. We first evaluated all patients by the VI-RADS. The correlation between sCYFRA, C-reactive protein (CRP) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) levels and clinicopathological features in the VI-RADS≥4 group was compared. Cut-off values were determined using ROC analysis. We also analyzed overall survival (OS) at each cut-off value.
Results
A total of 134 cases were examined. The diagnostic performance of VI-RADS was 87% for sensitivity and 89% for specificity, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.86. In the VI-RADS ≧ 4 group, in multivariate analysis, the levels of sCYFRA were most significantly higher than other variables in lymph nodes (p<0.001) and distant metastasis (p<0.001). The ROC curve showed AUCs of 0.924 and 0.896 for predicting lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis with sCYFRA in VI-RADS≥4 group. The cut-off value for sCYFRA was set at 2.0 ng/dL. The median follow-up was 13(1-56) months. Overall, 21 (15.6 %) patients developed tumor progression, and 18 (13.4 %) patients died. The AUC of sCYFRA predicting 1-year OS was 0.803 and 3-year OS was 0.802 in VI-RADS≥4 group. In all cases, multivariate COX analysis showed that the sCYFRA ≥2.0 ng/dL group was the most significant risk factor for OS (HR = 8.92, P < 0.001). In the VI-RADS≥4 group, patients with sCYFRA≥2.0 ng/dL was only risk factors for OS (HR = 5.19, P = 0.008). In the VI-RADS<4 group, levels of sCYFRA showed no difference in OS.
Conclusions
This study suggests that high levels of sCYFRA in VI-RADS ≥ 4 group could predict high-stage and poor prognosis of bladder cancer.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2019P - Disparities in urothelial carcinoma (UC) drug approval: Contrasting North America and Europe
Presenter: Jose Tapia
Session: Poster session 13
2020TiP - SOGUG-NEOWIN: A phase II, open-label, multi-centre trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of erdafitinib (ERDA) monotherapy and ERDA and cetrelimab (CET) as neoadjuvant treatment in cisplatin-ineligible patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and FGFR gene alterations
Presenter: Yohann Loriot
Session: Poster session 13
2022TiP - Stereotactic treatment with neoadjuvant radiotherapy and enfortumab vedotin: A phase I/II study for localized, cisplatin ineligible, muscle invasive bladder cancer (STAR-EV)
Presenter: Tian Zhang
Session: Poster session 13
2024TiP - NETOS: A personalized approach of neoadjuvant therapy, including INCB099280 monotherapy and bladder preservation, for muscle-invasive urothelial bladder carcinoma (MIBC) with ctDNA monitoring
Presenter: Valentina Tateo
Session: Poster session 13