Abstract 1127P
Background
The majority of metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM) patients require liver-directed therapy at some point in the course of their disease. Melphalan/Hepatic Delivery System (melphalan/HDS) is a drug/medical device combination that was recently approved by FDA for liver-directed treatment of unresectable mUM patients. The phase III FOCUS study demonstrated efficacy and safety of melphalan/HDS in a heterogenous patient population with unresectable mUM. Here we present efficacy analyses in clinically important subgroups.
Methods
Eligible patients with unresectable liver metastases from mUM, with or without extrahepatic disease, received treatment with percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP) of melphalan (3.0 mg/kg ideal body weight) once every 6-8 weeks for a maximum of 6 cycles. Efficacy endpoints including objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), were assessed among subgroups of patients with and without extrahepatic disease, previously treated and treatment-naive patients, and those with low (1-25%) and high (26-50%) liver tumor burden. Onset of ORR, serious adverse events (SAEs) and Grade 3/4 adverse events (AE) were assessed by treatment cycle.
Results
102 patients with mUM were enrolled; treatment was attempted in 95 patients, and 91 patients received treatment. Across the 6 subgroups, ORR ranged from 31.6% to 37.5%, median PFS ranged from 6.2 to 9.3 months, and median OS ranged from 16.9 to 22.4 months. 57.6% of tumor responses were observed in the first two treatment cycles. The percentages of patients who experienced SAEs in treatment cycles 1-6 were 22%, 15.5%, 13.6%, 5.5%, 7.5% and 17.6%, respectively, of the patients treated in each cycle; by-cycle percentages for Grade 3/4 AEs were 53.8%, 57.1%, 53%, 45.5%, 50% and 47.1%, respectively.
Conclusions
Treatment with melphalan/HDS provides clinically meaningful efficacy across the evaluated subgroups. Objective tumor responses occurred throughout all 6 treatment cycles, without evidence of cumulative toxicity.
Clinical trial identification
NCT02678572; EudraCT 2015-000417-44.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Delcath Systems, Inc.
Funding
Delcath Systems, Inc.
Disclosure
M. Wheater: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Delcath Systems. M. Orloff: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Delcath Systems, Replimune; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Immunocore; Financial Interests, Personal, Steering Committee Member: Ideaya. D. Eschelman: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Delcath Systems. S. Ochsenreither: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Immunocore, Delcath Systems, Janssen; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker’s Bureau: Immunocore. G. Beasley: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Funding: Replimune, Checkmate Pharmaceuticals, Philogen, Delcath Systems; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: BMS. R. Dummer: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: Novartis, Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), Roche, Amgen, Takeda, Pierre Fabre, Sun Pharma, Sanofi, Catalym, Second Genome, Regeneron, MaviVAX SA, T3 Pharma, Pfizer, Simcere. A.M. Arance: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Pierre Fabre, Novartis, Roche, BMS, MSD, Biontech; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel, accommodations, expenses: BMS, MSD. J. John: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Delcath Systems. J.S. Zager: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Delcath Systems; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Principal Investigator: Delcath Systems; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Delcath Systems. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1091P - Neoadjuvant cemiplimab for stage II–IV cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC): 2-year follow-up and biomarker analyses
Presenter: Danny Rischin
Session: Poster session 04
1092P - Nivolumab plus relatlimab vs nivolumab in previously untreated metastatic or unresectable melanoma: 3-year subgroup analyses from RELATIVITY-047
Presenter: Dirk Schadendorf
Session: Poster session 04
1093P - Preliminary biomarker analysis in the phase III PIVOTAL study: Evidence for the mechanism of action of daromun in melanoma
Presenter: Paolo Ascierto
Session: Poster session 04
1094P - NeoRisk: Neoadjuvant immunotherapy (NeoIT) recurrence risk assessment tool
Presenter: Ines Pires da Silva
Session: Poster session 04
1095P - Pembrolizumab versus placebo after a complete resection of high-risk stage III melanoma: 7-year results of the EORTC 1325-MG/Keynote-054 double-blind phase III trial
Presenter: Alexander Eggermont
Session: Poster session 04
1096P - Camrelizumab plus apatinib in patients with advanced mucosal melanoma: A 3-year survival update with biomarker analysis
Presenter: Zhengyun Zou
Session: Poster session 04
1098P - Mechanisms of recurrence following mRNA-4157 (V940) plus pembrolizumab or pembrolizumab alone in resected melanoma from the mRNA-4157-P201 (KEYNOTE-942) trial
Presenter: Ryan Sullivan
Session: Poster session 04
1099P - COMBI-EU: Adverse event management of adjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib (D+T) in patients with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Peter Mohr
Session: Poster session 04
1100P - Anti-PD1 + low-dose anti-CTLA4 immunotherapy pathological response rate in patients with stage III resectable melanoma: Phase III NEOMIMAJOR trial interim analysis
Presenter: Igor Samoylenko
Session: Poster session 04