Abstract 1252P
Background
The more precise 8th TNM classification and recent innovations in management of stage III NSCLC are leading to an increase in more personalized therapeutic options. Here, we describe the characteristics, treatments and survival of stage III patients included in a French nationwide cohort in 2020.
Methods
KBP is a Real-World French prospective study on Lung Cancer (LC) conducted in non-academic public hospitals (NPH). During the year 2020, all patients (pts) diagnosed with a Lung Cancer (LC) in 82 participating centers, the characteristics of the 8 999 patients included have already been reported.
Results
Among the pts included in KBP study with NSCLC, 1524 (20.1%) are diagnosed at stage III distributed into IIIA: 692 (45.4%), IIIB: 598 (39.2%), IIIC: 234 (15.4). 774 patients (50,7%) are classified at stage IIIN2 (39% IIIA and 61.0% IIIB). The mean age is 68.5 y. Mutation research is performed in 52.8% (805/1524), a PD-L1 analysis in 91.8% (1399/1524). The distribution of treatments is detailed in the table. Median OS is significantly better whatever the 1L treatment in stage IIIA 31.0 months [27.3 - 35.7] than IIIB and IIIC with respectively 20.4 [18.2 - 25.0] and 16.1 [13.5 - 20.7] months. Overall survival is significantly better for patients benefiting surgery (S), the 3y OS in stage IIIA is 62.9% [57.1 - 69.2] and in III B/C 55.8% [46.4 - 67.0] compared to patients receiving radiotherapy (RT) 39.2% [32.9 - 46.7] and 42.5% [37.4 - 48.1] or only systemic treatments (ST) 33.8% [26.9 - 42.6] and 23.3% [18.7 - 29.0]. Among N2 patients, surgery is also associated with a better prognosis than radiotherapy without surgery or systemic treatment alone (respectively 62.0% [55.2 - 69.7], 45.6% [40.3 - 51.6] and 25.5% [19.7 - 33.1]). Table: 1252P
IIIA 647 | IIIB/C 782 | P | |||
Surgery | 253 | (39.1) | 92 | (11.8) | |
S only | 52 | (20.6) | 26 | (28.3) | 0.17 |
S + RT | 40 | (15.8) | 15 | (16.3) | 1 |
S + CT | 188 | (74.3) | 62 | (67.4) | 0.26 |
S + IO | 12 | (4.7) | 3 | (3.3) | 0.77 |
S + TT | 0 | (0.0) | 2 | (2.2) | 0.071 |
M. OS (mth) | 47.6 [43.5 - NA] | 41.2 [32.6 - NA] | |||
RT (w/o S) | 202 | (31.2) | 339 | (43.4) | |
RT + CT | 181 | (89.6) | 318 | (93.8) | 0.11 |
RT + IO | 50 | (24.8) | 75 | (22.1) | 0.55 |
RT + TT | 0 | (0.0) | 2 | (0.6) | 0.53 |
M. OS (mth) | 26.1 [21.6 - 32.1] | 27.9 [22.9 - 34.1] | |||
ST (w/o S, w/o RT) | 143 | (22.1) | 280 | (35.8) | |
CT | 121 | (84.6) | 233 | (83.2) | 0.82 |
IO | 41 | (28.7) | 110 | (39.3) | 0.04 |
TT | 8 | (5.6) | 15 | (5.4) | 1.00 |
M. OS (mth) | 25.0 [19.1 - 29.2] | 13.1 [9.9 - 15.7] |
CT = chemotherapy, IO = immunotherapy, TT = targeted therapy, M. OS = Median overall survival, w/o = without, Mths = months
Conclusions
Many multimodalities therapeutic approaches are proposed in Stage III NSCLC, the analysis of this real-life study reflects the heterogeneous nature of stage III and the importance of a personalized approach.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
The authors would like to thank Margaux Orange (Catherine Thiriet, Alizée Petit and Alexia Letierce) for their help in preparing this article.
Legal entity responsible for the study
CPHG (Collège des Pneumologues des hopitaux Généraux).
Funding
The present study was promoted by the French College of General Hospital Pulmonologists (CPHG) with the endowment funds of Fondation du Souffle, Le Nouveau Souffle, Couleur espoir, the labeling of InCa (Institut national du Cancer) and French Hospital Federation-CNR, and financial support from the following laboratories: AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Chugaï, Janssen, MSD, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and Takeda.
Disclosure
D. Debieuvre: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Janssen, Sanofi-Winthrop, Amgen, Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: takeda; Financial Interests, Personal, Coordinating PI: Pfizer; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Roche, AstraZeneca, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, BMS, Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, Chugaï, Chiesi, Takeda, Bayer, Sanofi-Winthrop, Amgen, AbbVie. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1292P - A national real-world analysis of ROS1+ metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients management (explore ALK, cohort 2, GFPC 03-2019)
Presenter: Gaelle Rousseau Bussac
Session: Poster session 05
1293P - Mechanisms of resistance to selpercatinib in RET activated NSCLC and MTC from the LIBRETTO-001 trial
Presenter: Ben Solomon
Session: Poster session 05
1294P - Non-adenocarcinoma histology in patients with RET+ lung cancer: Response to RET-inhibitors and survival from the RET-MAP registry
Presenter: Arianna Marinello
Session: Poster session 05
1295P - EP0031 a next-generation selective RET inhibitor (SRI): Correlation of molecular and clinical responses in patients with RET alteration positive solid tumours naïve to or following prior SRI
Presenter: Elena Garralda
Session: Poster session 05
1296P - A phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BB-1701 in advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients with HER2 mutation/amplification
Presenter: Caicun Zhou
Session: Poster session 05
1297P - A phase II study of pyrotinib combined with apatinib in first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with primary HER-2 mutations/amplification
Presenter: Wenxin Jiang
Session: Poster session 05
1299P - First-line immunotherapy versus BRAF and MEK inhibitors for patients with BRAF V600E mutant metastatic non-small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Alessandro Di Federico
Session: Poster session 05
1300P - Treatment sequences in BRAF-V600-mutant non-small cell lung cancer: First-line targeted therapy versus first-line (chemo-) immunotherapy
Presenter: Marcel Wiesweg
Session: Poster session 05
1301P - BRAF-mutant metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: Real-world data from the Italian biomarker ATLAS database
Presenter: Alessandro Russo
Session: Poster session 05