Abstract 1679P
Background
CRCI is a recognized long-term sequel following cancer diagnosis and therapy, often understudied in developing countries. Our aim was to estimate the prevalence of CRCI prospectively among our patient population, prior to and following chemotherapy, and its association with different variables.
Methods
120 females with breast cancer stages I-III, aged between 18-65 years were recruited, before receiving chemotherapy. Subjective assessment by the functional assessment of cancer therapy-cognitive function scale (FACT-Cog) and objective by the Montreal cognitive assessment screening test (MOCA) was done at baseline and 3 months into chemotherapy.
Results
All 120 patients completed the baseline assessment, but 11 patients (9%) were lost to follow up. There was a statistically significant decrease in the mean total FACT-Cog score at follow up compared to baseline (mean ± SD: 98.12 ± 25.93 vs 109.4 ± 20.83, p<0.001). On univariate analysis, patients with younger age, premenopausal status and higher level of education significantly reported lower means at both time points. Molecular subtypes showed a significant association with the self-reported scores. Luminal B subtype was significantly associated with the highest reported baseline mean (mean± SD: 117.8 ± 15.38), and hence better self-perceived cognition while triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) was associated with the lowest scores (mean± SD: 97.10 ± 23.91) (p=0.001). Similar results were found at follow up. Only the molecular subtypes were found to significantly affect the self-reported scores, in the multivariate analysis. MOCA showed a negative significant correlation with the FACT-Cog (baseline: r= -0.357, p<0.001, and follow up: r= -0.295, p=0.002).
Conclusions
Self-reported CRCI is reported in our cohort at baseline and worsens following chemotherapy. Age, menopausal status, level of education and molecular subtype showed a significant association with the FACT-Cog score. MOCA might be an insensitive objective test to confirm the self-reported cognitive dysfunction.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1709P - Outcomes with novel combinations in non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC): ORACLE study
Presenter: Deepak Kilari
Session: Poster session 11
1710P - Exposure-response (E/R) relationship of nivolumab (N) and ipilimumab (I) in patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell clear cell carcinoma (mRCC) from the randomised phase II BIONIKK study
Presenter: Benoit Blanchet
Session: Poster session 11
1711P - Real-word data challenging the treatment paradigm in metastatic renal cancer: Time to separate IMDC intermediate / poor risk groups?
Presenter: John McGrane
Session: Poster session 11
1712P - Real-world efficacy of first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab and its practical predictive biomarkers in advanced renal cell carcinoma: First analysis from RENOIR study [KCSG GU22-13]
Presenter: Jwa Hoon Kim
Session: Poster session 11
1713P - A deep learning approach utilizing the electronic health record (EHR) to identify cancer recurrence in renal cell carcinoma (RCC)
Presenter: Jue Hou
Session: Poster session 11
1714P - Detection and monitoring of translocation renal cell carcinoma via epigenomic profiling of cell-free DNA
Presenter: Simon Garinet
Session: Poster session 11
1715P - Interim analysis results from a phase II study of adjuvant penpulimab in very high-risk clear cell renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Xu Zhang
Session: Poster session 11
1716P - Primary resistance to front-line immune-based combinations in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (ARON-1)
Presenter: martina catalano
Session: Poster session 11