Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 12

1853P - Risk model for overall survival (OS) based on composite patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in aNSCLC patients treated with first-line (1L) cemiplimab-based therapy

Date

14 Sep 2024

Session

Poster session 12

Topics

Immunotherapy

Tumour Site

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

David Gandara

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_2): S1077-S1114. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1612

Authors

D.R. Gandara1, M. Gogishvili2, A. Sezer3, T. Makharadze4, M. Gumus5, E. Yan6, J. Harnett7, P. Rietschel8, R. Quek7

Author affiliations

  • 1 Division Of Hematology/oncology, Department Of Medicine, UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, 95817 - Sacramento/US
  • 2 Oncology Department, High Technology Medical Centre, University Clinic Ltd, 0144 - Tbilisi/GE
  • 3 Department Of Medical Oncology, Başkent University, 06790 - Adana/TR
  • 4 Oncology, LTD High Technology Hospital Med Center, 0168 - Batumi/GE
  • 5 Department Of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, Istanbul Medeniyet University, 34370 - Istanbul/TR
  • 6 Biostatistics, Cyan Global Inc., 92130 - San Diego/US
  • 7 Oncology, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 10591 - Tarrytown/US
  • 8 Clinical Sciences Oncology Department, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 10591 - Tarrytown/US

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1853P

Background

PROs have shown promise as prognostic factors for OS. Risk modeling of OS based on single PRO scales was previously evaluated in pts with aNSCLC treated with 1L cemiplimab ± chemotherapy in 2 phase 3 trials. In this study, we further evaluate a risk model for OS based on composite PRO assessment.

Methods

Data from EMPOWER-Lung 1 (NCT03088540) and EMPOWER-Lung 3 (NCT03409614) were used to evaluate the association between baseline PRO burden and OS with a Cox proportional hazard model stratified by treatment, histology and PD-L1 level. Single-scale PROs (EORTC QLQ-C30 and LC13) were assessed using the HR for prognostic value; similarly, composite PRO endpoints (based on the combination of 1 functioning and 1 symptom scale) were assessed. PROs with higher HRs when comparing high vs low PRO burden are deemed to have higher risk of death.

Results

Top 10 composite PROs with the highest risk for death include combinations of functioning scales (social, role and physical) and select symptom scales (dyspnoea, appetite loss and pain from C30; dyspnoea and coughing from LC13) with nominal P-values

Conclusions

In pts with aNSCLC treated with 1L cemiplimab-based therapy, a risk model of OS using baseline PROs demonstrated greater prognostic value of composite PROs consisting of a functioning and symptom scale than relying on single PRO scales. These results suggest clinical utility of composite PROs for evaluating the risk of death; further development and analysis of composite PROs for clinical trials may be warranted.

Clinical trial identification

NCT03088540, NCT03409614.

Editorial acknowledgement

Medical writing support was provided by Qing Zhou, PhD, ELS, of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Legal entity responsible for the study

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Funding

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Disclosure

D.R. Gandara: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Funding: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Genentech, Merck; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: AdaGene, AstraZeneca, Genentech, Guardant Health, IO Biotech, Oncocyte, OncoHost; Financial Interests, Personal, Financially compensated role: Lilly, Merck, Novartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel: Guardant Health; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Lilly, Merck, Novartis. A. Sezer: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Funding: Roche, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merck Serono, AstraZeneca, Lilly, Novartis, Johnson & Johnson, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Sanofi. M. Gumus: Financial Interests, Personal, Financially compensated role: Roche, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Gen İlaç, Novartis. E. Yan: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Cyan Global Inc; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Regeneron. J. Harnett, P. Rietschel, R. Quek: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Regeneron; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Regeneron. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.

  • Analytics cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage.

  • We use marketing cookies to build a profile of you as a user through your actions on our site in order to better understand your interests and provide you with pertinent suggestions.