Abstract CN8
Background
The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic led many patients to face the difficult decision of weighing the risks and benefits associated with traveling to the hospital for cancer treatment. Driven by this context and motivated by the growing demand for safer and more convenient alternatives, we proposed expanding the administration of low-risk neoplastic treatments to the ambulatory setting. This program has been unprecedented in the Autonomous Community of Cantabria thus far, as there is currently no service that administers chemotherapy outside specialized units in the region's reference hospitals.
Methods
A pilot study was conducted to assess the safety and feasibility of administering low-risk antineoplastic treatments at home at the Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, in the city of Santander-Cantabria. The study sample consisted of 139 participants between November 2020 and April 2024. For a patient to be selected to receive treatment at home, they had to meet the following inclusion criteria: firstly, be actively undergoing treatment with low-risk antineoplastic drugs, either subcutaneously or intravenously after the third dose; have a residence in Santander and within a 10-kilometer radius; be at home accompanied by a caregiver between 8:00 and 14:00 on the day of treatment; be able to read and write, or alternatively, have a family member or caregiver available to complete satisfaction questionnaires if necessary. Patients were included in the study only after receiving all the information and providing their consent to participate.
Results
A total of 1,334 cycles were infused in 139 patients from December 2020 to January 2024. The average age of the treated population was 65 years, with 37% being male (n=52) and 63% female (n=87). Breast cancer was the most treated pathology at home (n=59), followed by lung cancer (n=35) and colon cancer (n=12). The most administered drug was trastuzumab (n=47), followed by Pembrolizumab (n=32), Bevacizumab (n=19), and Atezolizumab (n=17). During the pilot program, no adverse infusion reactions were recorded at home.
Conclusions
This project represents a step forward in optimizing oncological care, although further exploration of new ways to improve our patients' treatment experience is still needed.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Instituto de Investigación Valdecilla (IDIVAL).
Funding
IDIVAL, FUPOCAN, AstraZeneca, MSD, Bristol Myers Squibb.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
CN105 - Malignant bowel obstruction in advanced cancer: A nurse-led review of symptom management, dietitian involvement and outcomes at two sites of an NHS Hospital Trust
Presenter: Ravindhi Murphy
Session: EONS Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
CN106 - Nurses’ evaluation and education of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: A systematic review
Presenter: Cristina Mazzega Fabbro
Session: EONS Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
CN107 - The effect of Orem-based oral self-care protocol on high-dose chemotherapy-related oral mucositis and self-care agency in patients for hematologic malignancies: A randomized controlled study
Presenter: Dilek Eraslan
Session: EONS Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
CN108 - Comparison of symptom distress ranking between oncology nurses and pediatric patients receiving chemotherapy
Presenter: Enes Şimşek
Session: EONS Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
Slides