Abstract 1507P
Background
Pancreatic cancer (PC) constitutes over 3% of new cancer diagnoses in Europe, yet accounts for 7% of cancer deaths, ranking as the fourth leading cause of cancer mortality. PC remains lethal in over 80% of patients, with a 5-year relative survival rate of 13%. Although new therapies are explored, interventional clinical trials for PC represent merely 5.13% of global cancer trials. Addressing this high unmet need necessitates probing questions to enhance patient access to novel therapies and ensure robust trial design and execution.
Methods
Utilizing the Aurora Suite®, we generated data aggregation, visualization, and analysis. The Aurora Suite® is an advanced web application that leverages machine learning and AI to support the design, planning, and execution of clinical trials. Our approach integrated public domain and primary data sources. The trial NCT02184195 (POLO)- served as a reference and was compared to Aurora Suite® results for developing trial optimization recommendations.
Results
Using the Aurora Suite® and advanced AI capabilities in trial optimization, we compared the phase III PC reference trial 'POLO' with our results. We identified that POLO's country distribution includes a mix of favorable and non-favorable countries: Tier 1 (most favorable): Belgium, Canada, and Germany. Tier 2 (moderately favorable): Australia, Israel, Italy, and Great Britain. Tier 3 (minimally favorable): South Korea, The Netherland, and France. The Aurora Suite® identified additional countries and sites that could have been used to optimize POLO’s trial strategy and enrollment. POLO enrolled 154 participants across 103 sites over 49 months, achieving a 0.03 patients/site/month (p/s/m) enrollment rate. Our analysis indicates an industry median enrollment of 0.12 p/s/m. The Aurora Suite® could have enabled POLO to enroll more than 200% higher, whilst reducing sites required and enrollment time by 30%.
Conclusions
Innovative data-driven decision tools offer potential for expediting PC clinical trials, reducing trial duration, and providing enhanced efficiency leading to accelerated market access for new therapies and amplified patient benefits.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Aurora Analytica A.S.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1929P - Dabrafenib and trametinib (D+T) in BRAFV600E differentiated thyroid cancer: A real-world experience in Italy
Presenter: Laura Locati
Session: Poster session 18
1930P - Resensitization of BRAF-mutated radioactive iodine refractory differentiated thyroid cancer with longer duration of dabrafenib and trametinib
Presenter: Jiaxin Niu
Session: Poster session 18
1931P - Phase II study of PDR001 in combination with MAPK pathway inhibitors in patients with radioactive-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC)
Presenter: Winston Wong
Session: Poster session 18
1932P - Tyrosine kinase inhibitors-induced erythrocytosis in thyroid cancers: A novel safety signal from a retrospective study
Presenter: Silvia Marchesi
Session: Poster session 18
1933P - Utility of circulating tumoral DNA analysis by multi-gene NGS panels in tracking therapy progression of advanced sporadic medullary thyroid carcinoma
Presenter: Raffaele Ciampi
Session: Poster session 18
1934P - Active surveillance for higher-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma in China: A 10-year retrospective study
Presenter: Yan Hu
Session: Poster session 18
1935P - Sequence matters: Impact of first-line response in overall therapeutic outcome in differentiated thyroid cancer. Data from the Spanish national registry of thyroid cancer (REGETNE-Tiroides)
Presenter: Sergio Pérez Fernandez
Session: Poster session 18
1936P - Treatment outcomes of patients with anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (atc): Multicentric data from spanish national registry (regetne-tiroides)
Presenter: José Miguel Rodellar
Session: Poster session 18