Abstract 1157P
Background
PRRT is a crucial treatment for p with somatostatin receptor-expressing NET. Strategy of re-treating with PRRT (rePRRT) to enhance clinical benefit is gaining attention. Standardized protocols for the efficacy, safety and rePRRT administration remain undefined across centers.
Methods
SEPTRALU, a Spanish national registry, comprises over 500 p with NET treated with PRRT. This study explores rePRRT instances to identify variables associated with treatment outcomes.
Results
71 rePRRT p (41% female, 55y) were included. Main primary location was ileal (35%) and pancreatic (34%), with 35% being functional. Most had hepatic (85%), bone (25%) and peritoneal (14%) metastases. Histologically, mean Ki67 was 10% with 32% Ki67 ≥10%; WHO Grade 1: 37%, G2: 49%, G3: 14%). First PRRT (PRRT1) was given as 2nd (35.5%) and 3rd line (27%). All p received 4 doses, achieving an overall response rate (ORR) of 61.7% and progression free survival (PFS) of 35 months (m). Average interval between end of PRRT1 and rePRRT was 29.3 m. For rePRRT, p received 1 to 4 doses at rates of 100%, 66%, 24% and 17%, respectively. Discontinuation was mainly due to progression (18%). ORR for rePRRT was 17.6% with a clinical benefit rate of 58.8% and PFS was not reached after 10 months of follow-up, with a 10-months PFS rate of 78%. No new toxicity alerts were reported. Univariate analysis identified predictors for rePRRT radiological response: previous PRRT1 response (p 0.004), Ki67 >30% (p 0.033) and WHO G3 (p 0.035).
Conclusions
RePRRT offers a viable therapeutic strategy for NETs, with favorable efficacy and identificable response predictors, notably prior PRRT response. Ongoing trials will yield insights into the optimal rePRRT duration and its sequencing within therapeutic algorithms.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
J. Hernando Cubero: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Eisai, Ipsen, Novartis, AAA, Angelini, Pfizer, Roche. U. Anido Herranz: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Advanced Accelerator Applications, Ipsen, AstraZeneca, Merck, Pfizer, Astellas, Bayer, Eisai, BMS, Kyowa Kirin, Rovi; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Advanced Accelerator Applications, Ipsen, AstraZeneca, Merck, Pfizer, Bayer; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel expenses: Esteve. A. Garcia Alvarez: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: ADACAP (Novartis); Other, Expenses (Travel, Congress inscription): Advanz, Eisai, Ipsen, ADACAP (Novartis). All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
972P - Efficacy and safety of lenvatinib vs sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma: A multi-center real-world study from the LINK Research Network
Presenter: Jung Yong Hong
Session: Poster session 17
973P - Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab or lenvatinib versus sorafenib as first-line therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Overall survival using real-world data from TrinetX platform
Presenter: Lisardo Ugidos De La Varga
Session: Poster session 17
977P - Transarterial chemoembolization combined with lenvatinib plus tislelizumab for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter cohort study
Presenter: Yi Chen
Session: Poster session 17
978P - Efficacy and safety analysis of transarterial chemoembolization combined donafenib with or without immune checkpoint inhibitors in for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): A prospective, single-arm, single center, phase Ⅱ clinical study
Presenter: Jinpeng Li
Session: Poster session 17
979P - Initial results from the phase II randomized trial comparing TACE with irinotecan and mitomycin C to doxorubicin in intermediate stage HCC (IRITACE trial)
Presenter: Oliver Waidmann
Session: Poster session 17