Abstract 375P
Background
The NAME study aims at investigating whether the treatment with Navelbine, according to the metronomic principle, is superior to conventional treatment in terms of efficacy and safety. The study has the EUDRACT no: 2016-002165-63. In addition to better efficacy, preliminary studies show treatment with frequent small dosages, not only have an effect on the tumour cells, but also, an effect on the angiogenesis and the immune cells.
Methods
The NAME trial is an open randomized multicentre phase II study. We included 163 patients with HER2 normal metastatic breast cancer in Denmark from 2017-2022. Both patients with Estrogenic receptor (ER) positive and ER negative tumours were included in the study. The randomisation is between the standard Arm A, where the patients are treated with Vinorelbine (Navelbine Oralâ): 60 mg/m2 day 1 and day 8, every three weeks for the first cycle. Hereafter 80 mg/m2 in the following cycles. In the metronomic experimental Arm B, the patients receive Vinorelbine (Navelbine Oralâ): daily doses of Navelbine. The start dose is 30 mg per day. Reduction is possible.
Results
The patients were well balanced between the two arms. Median age were 68-69 years. Primarily performance status 0-1. The adverse events found in the study shows the two regimes were both well tolerated with mostly low-grade adverse events. We found a median progression free survival (PFS) in arm A of 3.9 months (95% CI 3.4-4.5) and a median PFS in arm B of 2.3 months (95% CI 1.5-3.0). The difference was non-significant (P=0.236). The median overall survival (OS) was 16.63 months (95% CI 14.66-18.61) in arm A and 15.13 months (95% CI 12.11-18.16) in arm B. Also, non-significant (P=0.355).
Conclusions
The study was conducted in order investigate metronomic chemotherapy using a randomized trial design. There was no significant difference between the two arms regarding effect. No new signals regarding safety were observed. While metronomic chemotherapy may offer certain advantages, our findings could not demonstrate any benefit, when using Navelbine in advanced breast cancer patients in this particular investigator initiated, multicentre, Danish randomised controlled trial, the NAME trial.
Clinical trial identification
EudraCT 2016-002165-63 The NAME trial.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Anne Sofie Brems-Eskildsen.
Funding
Pierre Fabre, Overture's Torg 1, Plan 2 SE-19147 Sollentuna Sweden.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
533P - First-line treatment in older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A large real-world study
Presenter: debora basile
Session: Poster session 15
534P - Second-line treatment in older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: The ELECTRA study
Presenter: Alessia Cordua
Session: Poster session 15
535P - Safety and efficacy of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors in elderly colorectal cancer patients: An Italian real-world multicenter experience
Presenter: Alessandra Boccaccino
Session: Poster session 15
536P - A randomized phase II/III trial comparing hepatectomy followed by mFOLFOX6 with hepatectomy alone for liver metastasis from colorectal cancer: Long-term results of JCOG0603
Presenter: Yukihide Kanemitsu
Session: Poster session 15
537P - Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy combined with fruquintinib and tislelizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer: Updated findings from a single-arm, prospective phase II trial (RIFLE)
Presenter: Yajiie Chen
Session: Poster session 15
538P - Combined hepatectomy with complete cytoreduction (CCS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) vs. HIPEC alone for metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Gabriele Lech
Session: Poster session 15
540P - Early treatment discontinuation (ETD) in dMMR/MSI-H metastastic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)
Presenter: Julien Taieb
Session: Poster session 15
541P - Nivolumab (NIVO) plus ipilimumab (IPI) vs chemotherapy (chemo) as first-line (1L) treatment for microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Subgroup efficacy and expanded safety analyses from CheckMate 8HW
Presenter: Thierry André
Session: Poster session 15