Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 18

1449P - Recurrent patient-reported outcome (PRO)-based symptomatic deterioration predicts progression-free survival (PFS): Results from RATIONALE-305

Date

14 Sep 2024

Session

Poster session 18

Topics

Immunotherapy

Tumour Site

Gastric Cancer;  Gastro-Oesophageal Junction Cancer

Presenters

Markus Moehler

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_2): S878-S912. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1603

Authors

M. Moehler1, D. Serrano2, H. Xu3, T. Sheng4, L. Li5, B. Barnes6, G. Barnes6, D. Oh7

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Internal Medicine, Johannes Gutenberg-University Clinic, 55131 - Mainz/DE
  • 2 Founder, The Psychometrics Team, 82801 - Sheridan/US
  • 3 Medical Affairs, BeiGene (Beijing) Co., Ltd, 102206 - Beijing/CN
  • 4 Medical Oncology, BeiGene USA, Inc., San Mateo/US
  • 5 Clinical Development, BeiGene (Beijing) Co., Ltd, 102206 - Beijing/CN
  • 6 Pro Research, BeiGene USA, Inc., 94404 - San Mateo/US
  • 7 Internal Medicine Dept., Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 110-744 - Seoul/KR

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1449P

Background

PRO-based symptom scores are routinely employed in time to deterioration (TTD) analyses. In contrast to PFS, the recurrent nature of PRO symptom deterioration may result in endpoints with “transient” terminal event times. The TTD framework forces a single-event solution onto a recurrent event problem. Recurrent event survival models remedy this limitation. Thus, we present a joint survival model (JM) linking recurrent PRO-based deterioration to PFS assessed by investigator (progression or death).

Methods

RATIONALE-305 (NCT03777657) was a randomized phase 3 trial of tislelizumab (TIS) + chemotherapy (chemo) vs. placebo (PBO) + chemo as first-line treatment for patients (pts) with locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma. EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-STO22 symptom endpoints were modeled. Osoba’s 10pt threshold was used to define PRO-based deterioration events from treatment cycles 2 to 38. Emphasis in abstract is placed on recurrent UGI deterioration (R UGI-D) events modeled with frailty cox models and PFS modeled via Cox proportional hazards models within a JM. The PFS model adjusted the R UGI-D model for informative missing PRO data. R UGI-D frailties predicted PFS. Pts were censored without R UGI-D events by Cycle 38 or time of disease progression or if they remained progression free to end of study.

Results

Of the 896 pts, 514 (57.4%), 254 (28.3%), 83 (9.3%), 26 (2.9%), 16 (1.8%), and 3 (0.3%) experienced zero (censored), one, two, three, four, and five R UGI-D events, respectively. Higher rates of R UGI-D events predicted increased risk of progression/death (HR 3.38, P<0.00001), irrespective of treatment. In contrast to PBO + chemo, TIS + chemo was not associated with significantly increased risk of R UGI-D events but was associated with a 27% reduction in risk of progression/death (HR 0.73, P=0.007). Similar findings were observed between recurrent deterioration in appetite, fatigue, and pain/discomfort and PFS.

Conclusions

This analysis demonstrated that recurrent PRO deterioration was strongly predictive of PFS in pts with advanced gastric/GEJ cancer.

Clinical trial identification

NCT03777657.

Editorial acknowledgement

Medical writing support, under the direction of the authors, was provided by Jason C. Allaire, PhD of Generativity Solutions Group. Editorial and submission support was provided by Envision Pharma Inc.

Legal entity responsible for the study

BeiGene, Ltd.

Funding

BeiGene, Ltd.

Disclosure

M. Moehler: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Bayer, MSD, Merck Serono, Amgen, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Roche, Lilly, Servier, BeiGene, BMS, AstraZeneca, Astellas, Dragonfly, Novartis; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Non remunerated activity: Amgen, Roche/Genentech, Merck Serono, MSD Oncology, BMS, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Servier, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, Falk Foundation, Transcenta, Daiichi Sankyo, Astellas, Nordic; Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant: Amgen, Leap Therapeutics, Merck Serono, MSD. D. Serrano: Financial Interests, Personal, Research Funding: AbbVie, Alcon, BeiGene, BioMarin, Boehringer Ingelheim, Insmed, Janssen, Sanofi, Scilex, Seagen. H. Xu, T. Sheng, B. Barnes: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: BeiGene. L. Li: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: BeiGene; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: BeiGene; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel: BeiGene. G. Barnes: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: BeiGene; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: BeiGene. D. Oh: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Novartis, Genentech/Roche, Merck Serono, Bayer, Taiho, Aslan, Halozyme, Zymeworks, BMS/Celgene, BeiGene, Basilea, Turning Point, Yuhan, Arcus Biosciences, IQVIA, MSD, LG Chem, Astellas, AbbVie, J-Pharma, Mirati Therapeutics, Eutilex, Moderna, Idience; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca, Novartis, Array, Eli Lilly, Servier, BeiGene, MSD, Handok.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.