Abstract 1204P
Background
Comprehensive molecular profiling is essential for personalised cancer care. In the United Kingdom, Genomics England partners with the National Health Service to provide whole-genome sequencing (WGS). The 100,000 Genomes Project established infrastructures to incorporate WGS into clinical practice. However, the real-world utility of whole genome sequencing in adult cancer patients is poorly described.
Methods
The 100,000 Genome Project is a national prospective cohort study, which sought to sequence 100,000 whole genomes from patients with cancers or rare diseases. This is a retrospective evaluation of data collated during the 100,000 Genome Project for patients with cancers recruited by the West Midlands Genomic Medicine Centre. Actionable genes are defined by the GenomOncology Knowledge Management System as genes with reported therapeutic, prognostic or clinical trial associations. The presented work evaluates the clinical utility of WGS by assessing the variants identified, GTAB recommendations, and whether recommendations altered clinical practice.
Results
4851 participants were included. A third of patients had no sample or sample failed quality control (1451/4851; 29.9%). 37.4% of patients (1816/4851) were clinically excluded (including due to death or poor fitness) before Genomics Tumour Advisory Board (GTAB) discussion. For those with successful sequencing (24.4%; 1183/4851), 7 in 10 (846/1183; 71.5%) had reported potentially actionable variants, of whom 428/846 (50.6%) had recommendations made. One in 12 participants (8.6%; 416/4851) had GTAB recommendations, the majority being additional treatments or clinical trials (60.6%; 252/416). Clinical exclusion rates and the availability of GTAB recommendations varied between cancer types (p<0.0001). At the last follow up, only a small proportion of patients had therapeutic recommendations followed, representing 5.2% of all recommendations (13/252).
Conclusions
The 100,000 Genomes Project has established essential infrastructure and regional experience to deliver WGS. The majority had potentially actionable variants. Ensuring GTAB recommendations are followed will maximize benefits for patients.
Clinical trial identification
The current work is a retrospective analysis of patients enrolled in the 100,000 genome project in the West Midlands. All data analysed was routinely collected. The 100,000 genome project was approved by the HRA Committee East of England Cambridge South (REC Ref 14/EE/1112).
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
G. Middleton: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: BMS, Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: BMS, Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Servier, Takeda; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, Funding for organoids: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, Clinical Trial Funding: BMS, MSD. A.D. Beggs: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor, Laboratory support and consultancy fees: Illumina Inc, Oxford Nanopre. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1502P - Sexual dysfunction and quality of life in rectal cancer
Presenter: Fatih Kus
Session: Poster session 10
1503P - Spiritual needs in cancer patients: A cross-sectional study
Presenter: Diego Toloi
Session: Poster session 10
1546P - Use of ESMO-MCBS Scorecards in supporting funding decisions in private insurance
Presenter: Samantha Field
Session: Poster session 10
1547P - Time from approval to reimbursement of new cancer and non-cancer drugs: A comparative analysis between the US, England, Germany, and Switzerland (2011-2022)
Presenter: Camille Glaus
Session: Poster session 10
1548P - Real-world impact of the platinum chemotherapy shortage on advanced cancer patients
Presenter: Jacob Reibel
Session: Poster session 10
1549P - Accelerating access to innovative oncology drugs: Insights from France's early access reform
Presenter: Tess Martin
Session: Poster session 10
1550P - Addressing uncertainties of clinical value and improving access for newly authorised indications through DRUG-Access Protocol (DAP)-like platforms: Joint collection and evaluation of real-world evidence
Presenter: Sahar van Waalwijk van Doorn-Khosrovani
Session: Poster session 10
1551P - Breakthrough therapy cancer drugs and indications with FDA approval: Development time, innovation, trials, clinical benefit, epidemiology, and price
Presenter: Christoph Michaeli
Session: Poster session 10
1552P - Regulatory approval of novel immunotherapy for lymphoid neoplasm in the US, EU, and Japan
Presenter: Kensuke Matsuda
Session: Poster session 10
1553P - Access to EMA approved drugs in Europe, disparities across a border
Presenter: Orla Fitzpatrick
Session: Poster session 10