Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 11

1711P - Real-word data challenging the treatment paradigm in metastatic renal cancer: Time to separate IMDC intermediate / poor risk groups?

Date

14 Sep 2024

Session

Poster session 11

Topics

Targeted Therapy;  Immunotherapy

Tumour Site

Renal Cell Cancer

Presenters

John McGrane

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_2): S1012-S1030. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1609

Authors

R. Frazer1, A. Bahl2, A. Challapalli3, P. Roy4, M. Tuthill5, C. Forde6, J.M. Malik7, X. Jiang8, S.M. Alam9, E.C.E. Jones10, N. Charnley11, W.M. Mohamed12, N.O. Moon13, D. Parslow14, T.R. Geldart15, C.L. Dyke16, J.C. Tapia17, D. Lee18, G.J. Melendez-Torres18

Author affiliations

  • 1 Oncology, Velindre Cancer Centre - Velindre NHS University Trust - NHS Wales, CF14 2TL - Cardiff/GB
  • 2 Medical Oncology, BHOC - Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, BS2 8ED - Bristol/GB
  • 3 Medical Oncology, Bristol Haematology & Oncology Centre, BS1 3NU - Bristol/GB
  • 4 Clinical Oncology, Velindre NHS Trust, CF142TL - Cardiff/IN
  • 5 Department Of Oncology And Haematology, Charing Cross Hospital - Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, W6 8RF - London/GB
  • 6 Medical Oncology Department, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre - Belfast Health & Social Care Trust, BT9 7AB - Belfast/GB
  • 7 Edinburgh Cancer Centre, NHS Lothian, EH1 3EG - Edinburgh/GB
  • 8 Medical Oncology, The Freeman Hospital (NHS Foundation Trust) Northern Centre for Cancer Care, NE7 7DN - Newcastle-upon-Tyne/GB
  • 9 Oncology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, HA6 2RN - Northwood/GB
  • 10 Medical Oncology Department, Southampton General Hospital, SO16 6YD - Southampton/GB
  • 11 Medical Oncology, Royal Preston Hospital-Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, PR2 9HT - Preston/GB
  • 12 Oncology Department, Singleton Hospital - Swansea Bay UHB, SA2 8QA - Swansea/GB
  • 13 Oncology, Royal Cornwall Hospital Trust NHS Trust, TR1 3LQ - Truro/GB
  • 14 Medical Oncology, University Hospital Plymouth NHS Trust, PL6 8DH - Plymouth/GB
  • 15 Oncology Department, Poole Hospital, BH15 2JB - Poole/GB
  • 16 Oncology Dept., Torbay Hospital, TQ2 7AA - Torquay/GB
  • 17 Medical Oncology Department, Velindre Cancer Centre - Velindre NHS University Trust - NHS Wales, CF14 2TL - Cardiff/GB
  • 18 Medical Oncology, University of Exeter - St Luke's Campus, EX1 2LU - Exeter/GB

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1711P

Background

In the current landscape IMDC prognostic group has been used as a surrogate for treatment choices in 1st line metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in clinical trials. This has resulted in distinction between IMDC intermediate & poor risk (IR/PR) group compared to IMDC favourable risk (FR) group wherein, IR/PR IMDC groups get analysed as one treatment group. With clinical equipoise with IOTKI and IOIO in IR/PR group, we have dissected outcomes of 1st line systemic anticancer therapy (SACT) in mRCC by IMDC groups.

Methods

Multicentre retrospective study (UKROC) of patients commencing SACT for mRCC between 01/01/2018-30/06/2021 at 17 UK NHS trusts. Patient demographics, tumour histology and IMDC group were analysed. Overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and the statistical significance of differences in outcome between the IMDC groups was assessed with the cox-regression testing, stratified by 1st line SACT choice.

Results

1319 patients were identified with a median age of 64 years. 294 (22.3%), 695 (52.7%), 321 (24.3%) patients were IMDC FR, IR and PR respectively. 311, 196 and 778 patients received IOIO, IOTKI and single agent TKI respectively in the 1st line setting (total=1286). IMDC PR In the IOIO group 30.9% of patients were IMDC PR compared to 17.3% and 23.8% in IOTKI and TKI groups respectively. In the IMDC PR group, there was a statistically significant OS advantage of IOIO compared to IOTKI and TKI therapy. Median OS was IOIO (21.8m), IOTKI (7.3m), TKI (8.6m). HR = 0.48 in favour of IOIO compared to IOTKI [CI 0.3-0.78]. Median PFS was IOIO (6.5m), IOTKI (4.2m), TKI(4.1) – not significant. IMDC IR No major statistical OS difference between treatment groups however, IOTKI was numerically trending higher - IOTKI (NR), IOIO (27.6m), TKI (22.2m). Median PFS in intermediate – IOTKI (11.7m), IOIO (7.6m), TKI (7.6m) – not significant.

Conclusions

In the IMDC PR group we have demonstrated a significant OS benefit for IOIO compared to IOTKI. In the IMDC IR group there is a trend in favour of IOTKI over other treatments. This suggests that the IMDC groups should be viewed separately for treatment and IO/IO should be the standard of care in the real world for IMDC PR mRCC patients.

Clinical trial identification

UK Renal Oncology Collaborative - Real world review of therapy choices and outcomes in metastatic renal cancer; REC reference:24/SC/0038; Protocol number: V0.2; IRAS project ID: 338935 Health Research Authority – NHS.

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Royal Cornwall Hospital.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

J. McGrane: Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker, Astellas, Beyer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, GSK, Janssen-Cilag, Ipsen, Pfizer, Merck, MSD, Roche: Royal Cormwall Hospital. R. Frazer: Financial Interests, Advisory Board, BMS, Ipsen, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sanofi, Servier: Velindre Cancer Centre Cardiff. A. Challapalli: Financial Interests, Advisory Board, Bayer, Astellas, Janssen, Pfizer, BMS, Ipsen, Novartis, Eusa, Eisai Ltd, Merck: Royal Bristol Infirmary. M. Tuthill: Financial Interests, Advisory Board, Eisai, BMS: Oxford NHS Trust. C. Forde: Financial Interests, Advisory Board, Ipsen, MSD: Belfast City Hospital. J.M. Malik: Financial Interests, Advisory Board, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Merck-Pfizer, Ipsen, Eusa Pharma, MSD, Pfizer, Astellas: Western General Hospital, Edinburgh. D. Parslow: Financial Interests, Advisory Board, BMS: University Hospital Plymouth. D. Lee: Financial Interests, Advisory Board, 1. Associate Professor of Health Economics and Health Policy 2. PenTAG, University of Exeter 3. Employee of University of Exeter who receive funding from the NIHR to undertake NICE appraisals including the pathways pilot in RCC: University of Exeter. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.