Abstract 1711P
Background
In the current landscape IMDC prognostic group has been used as a surrogate for treatment choices in 1st line metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in clinical trials. This has resulted in distinction between IMDC intermediate & poor risk (IR/PR) group compared to IMDC favourable risk (FR) group wherein, IR/PR IMDC groups get analysed as one treatment group. With clinical equipoise with IOTKI and IOIO in IR/PR group, we have dissected outcomes of 1st line systemic anticancer therapy (SACT) in mRCC by IMDC groups.
Methods
Multicentre retrospective study (UKROC) of patients commencing SACT for mRCC between 01/01/2018-30/06/2021 at 17 UK NHS trusts. Patient demographics, tumour histology and IMDC group were analysed. Overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and the statistical significance of differences in outcome between the IMDC groups was assessed with the cox-regression testing, stratified by 1st line SACT choice.
Results
1319 patients were identified with a median age of 64 years. 294 (22.3%), 695 (52.7%), 321 (24.3%) patients were IMDC FR, IR and PR respectively. 311, 196 and 778 patients received IOIO, IOTKI and single agent TKI respectively in the 1st line setting (total=1286). IMDC PR In the IOIO group 30.9% of patients were IMDC PR compared to 17.3% and 23.8% in IOTKI and TKI groups respectively. In the IMDC PR group, there was a statistically significant OS advantage of IOIO compared to IOTKI and TKI therapy. Median OS was IOIO (21.8m), IOTKI (7.3m), TKI (8.6m). HR = 0.48 in favour of IOIO compared to IOTKI [CI 0.3-0.78]. Median PFS was IOIO (6.5m), IOTKI (4.2m), TKI(4.1) – not significant. IMDC IR No major statistical OS difference between treatment groups however, IOTKI was numerically trending higher - IOTKI (NR), IOIO (27.6m), TKI (22.2m). Median PFS in intermediate – IOTKI (11.7m), IOIO (7.6m), TKI (7.6m) – not significant.
Conclusions
In the IMDC PR group we have demonstrated a significant OS benefit for IOIO compared to IOTKI. In the IMDC IR group there is a trend in favour of IOTKI over other treatments. This suggests that the IMDC groups should be viewed separately for treatment and IO/IO should be the standard of care in the real world for IMDC PR mRCC patients.
Clinical trial identification
UK Renal Oncology Collaborative - Real world review of therapy choices and outcomes in metastatic renal cancer; REC reference:24/SC/0038; Protocol number: V0.2; IRAS project ID: 338935 Health Research Authority – NHS.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Royal Cornwall Hospital.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
J. McGrane: Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker, Astellas, Beyer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, GSK, Janssen-Cilag, Ipsen, Pfizer, Merck, MSD, Roche: Royal Cormwall Hospital. R. Frazer: Financial Interests, Advisory Board, BMS, Ipsen, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sanofi, Servier: Velindre Cancer Centre Cardiff. A. Challapalli: Financial Interests, Advisory Board, Bayer, Astellas, Janssen, Pfizer, BMS, Ipsen, Novartis, Eusa, Eisai Ltd, Merck: Royal Bristol Infirmary. M. Tuthill: Financial Interests, Advisory Board, Eisai, BMS: Oxford NHS Trust. C. Forde: Financial Interests, Advisory Board, Ipsen, MSD: Belfast City Hospital. J.M. Malik: Financial Interests, Advisory Board, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Merck-Pfizer, Ipsen, Eusa Pharma, MSD, Pfizer, Astellas: Western General Hospital, Edinburgh. D. Parslow: Financial Interests, Advisory Board, BMS: University Hospital Plymouth. D. Lee: Financial Interests, Advisory Board, 1. Associate Professor of Health Economics and Health Policy 2. PenTAG, University of Exeter 3. Employee of University of Exeter who receive funding from the NIHR to undertake NICE appraisals including the pathways pilot in RCC: University of Exeter. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1698P - Avelumab + axitinib (Ave + Axi) vs sunitinib (Sun) in advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC): Final analysis of patient (pt)-reported outcomes (PROs) and quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity (Q-TWiST)
Presenter: Balaji Venugopal
Session: Poster session 11
1699P - Impact of Latino ethnicity on the gut microbiome and response to immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) with CBM588 in patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC)
Presenter: Regina Barragan-Carrillo
Session: Poster session 11
1700P - Impact of sarcomatoid (S) and rhabdoid (R) components (comp.) on the efficacy of nivolumab (N) +/- ipilimumab (I) in the first-line (L1) treatment of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in the randomized phase II BIONIKK trial
Presenter: Yann-Alexandre Vano
Session: Poster session 11
1701P - NEOTAX: A phase II trial of neoadjuvant toripalimab plus axitinib for clear cell renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava tumor thrombus
Presenter: Liangyou Gu
Session: Poster session 11
1702P - Updated results of phase II study of cabozantinib (Cabo) with nivolumab (Nivo) and ipilimumab (Ipi) in advanced renal cell carcinoma with divergent histologies (RCCdh)
Presenter: Bradley McGregor
Session: Poster session 11
1703P - Updated overall survival in patients with prior checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) therapy in the phase III TIVO-3 study
Presenter: Miguel Zugman
Session: Poster session 11
1704P - Potential surrogate endpoints for overall survival (OS) in immunotherapy (IO)-treated metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): An International Metastatic Database Consortium (IMDC) study
Presenter: Renee Saliby
Session: Poster session 11
1705P - Association between baseline radiological tumor burden (BRTB) and outcomes in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) treated with first line (1L) immunotherapy (IO)-based regimens
Presenter: Rashad Nawfal
Session: Poster session 11
1707P - A plasma proteomic based algorithm is associated with prognosis in renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Eddy Saad
Session: Poster session 11