Abstract 1686P
Background
As global cancer cases increase exponentially, the number of caregivers subsequently increases to support patients. Despite being indispensable, the available resource was reserved mainly for patients, undermining the importance of caregivers who also share the struggle and burden. The chronic amount of stress and responsibility that caregivers face leads to impairment of quality of life (QOL). Further, most research that assesses the QOL is mainly conducted in the developed countries with robust palliative care. This comparative study aims to map and explore the status quo of QOL levels from caregivers of cancer patients in Asia. In addition, to investigate the correlation of QOL impairments in caregivers with sociodemographic factors.
Methods
A comprehensive systematic review of the literature was performed through databases with the keywords “cancer”, “caregiver”,” quality of life”, and “Asia” spans from 2004-2024. 371 articles that satisfy eligible criteria were retrieved. A total of 1271 family caregivers for cancer patients who had taken outpatient treatment, finished sociodemographic, and the Caregiver Quality of Life Index-Cancer (CQOLC) survey were included. Gathered CQOLC total scores from 12 countries including Indonesia, Singapore, Malaysia, Turkey, Iran, Jordanian, India, South Korea, China, Taiwan, Japan, and Saudi Arabia dataset, were compared and analyzed for their correlation with sociodemographic factors.
Results
Different distributions of total scores of CQOLC in 12 Asia countries observed with higher CQOLC total scores were scored within the developed countries with mature palliative care systems. Further, varying caregiver determinants including different sociodemographic characteristics could produce impaired QOL such as male gender, parental relationships, certain ethnicity, and late-stage cancer.
Conclusions
Despite sharing cultural context and family-based caregivers, uneven QOL distribution was observed across Asian countries. This study also highlights the potential areas to be improved. Additionally, acknowledging the diversity of values, culture, and socio-demographics significantly helps in creating more optimal interventions to support caregivers.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1627P - Long survivors after androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with or without docetaxel for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC): Long-term follow-up of GETUG-15
Presenter: Sarah Blanchet-Deverly
Session: Poster session 11
1628P - Factors influencing clinical and biological response in patients treated with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 under France's early access program
Presenter: Vincent Habouzit
Session: Poster session 11
1629P - Lutetium-177–prostate-specific membrane antigen (177Lu-PSMA) therapy in patients (pts) with prior Radium-223 (223Ra)
Presenter: Kambiz Rahbar
Session: Poster session 11
1630P - A multicenter retrospective study on the efficacy of anti-PD-(L)1 in microsatellite unstable (MSI-H) metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)
Presenter: Sandra Van Wilpe
Session: Poster session 11
1632P - Impact of androgen pathway inhibitors on cognitive function in elderly patients with metastatic prostate cancer: Results from the COG-PRO trial
Presenter: Antoine Boué
Session: Poster session 11
1634P - Does lower serum testosterone predict metastases-free survival in nmCRPC patients treated with novel antiandrogens? A post-hoc analysis of SPARTAN and ARAMIS
Presenter: Xudong Ni
Session: Poster session 11
1635P - Validation of automated bone scan index as a progression endpoint in two phase III studies of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients
Presenter: Andrea Knezevic
Session: Poster session 11