Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 13

2009P - PUNCH02: Primary results from a phase II study of tislelizumab combined with disitamab vedotin as a bladder preservation therapy for urine tumor DNA (utDNA)-defined clinical complete response (cCR) MIBC patients

Date

14 Sep 2024

Session

Poster session 13

Topics

Targeted Therapy;  Immunotherapy

Tumour Site

Urothelial Cancer

Presenters

Bin Huang

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_2): S1135-S1169. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1616

Authors

B. Huang, Z. Wang, C. Luo, Y. Wu, J. Lei, L. Chen, J. Chen

Author affiliations

  • The Urology Department, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 510000 - Guang Zhou/CN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 2009P

Background

Disitamab vedotin (RC48) was a novel antibody drug conjugate that targets the Her2 protein. The phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tislelizumab combined with RC48 as a bladder preservation therapy for utDNA-defined cCR MIBC patients (pts).

Methods

The study enrolled pts with cT2-4aN0M0 were diagnosed Her2-positive (IHC 2+ or 3+). Firstly, pts received maximal TURBT, then received tislelizumab (200 mg, Q3W, 4 cycles) and RC48 (2.0 mg/kg, Q2W, 4 cycles). Pts who achieved cCR considered bladder preservation and non-cCR pts underwent cystectomy. cCR was defined as normal urine cytology and MRI imaging, bladder biopsies≤cTa. Secondly, the cCR pts further received utDNA testing. cCR pts who were negative for utDNA proceeded bladder preservation, who were positive for utDNA proceeded bladder preservation or cystectomy according to pt's will. Finally, all pts received tislelizumab combined with RC48 for one year followed by surveillance. The primary endpoint was utDNA-defined cCR rate (defined as cCR and negative for utDNA). Secondary endpoints were bladder-preservation rate and safety.

Results

By Mar. 2024, 10 pts were enrolled and analyzed (male 70%; median age 66.6 (39-75)). cT2=80%, cT3=20%, Her2(2+)=30%, Her2(3+)=70%, Single tumor=30%. 100% pts received maximal TURBT. The median number of tislelizumab and RC48 cycles were 4 (4-4) and 4 (4-4), respectively. Median follow up was 5.7 months (3.2-12.7). The utDNA-defined cCR rate was 70.0% (95% CI, 21.7%-80.7%). One cCR pt was positive for utDNA and opted for bladder preservation. The utDNA-defined cCR rate was 100.0% (95% CI, 100%-100%) for Her2(3+)pts. The utDNA-defined cCR rate was 100.0% (95% CI, 100%-100%) for single tumor pts. During follow-up, the bladder-preservation rate for utDNA-defined cCR pts was 100% (95%CI, 100%-100%). The treatment-related adverse events included a poor appetite (n=1, G1), mouth ulcer (n=1, G2), rash (n=1, G1), alopecia (n=1, G1), numbness in hands and feet (n=2, G2).

Conclusions

Tislelizumab combined with RC48 demonstrated the efficacy and safety in utDNA-defined cCR pts for precise bladder preservation treatment.

Clinical trial identification

ChiCTR2400080073.

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, The Urology Department.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.