Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Proffered paper session 1: GI tumours, upper digestive

LBA40 - Primary results from the phase III ALTN-AK105-III-02 study: Anlotinib plus penpulimab versus sorafenib as first-line (1L) therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC)

Date

13 Sep 2024

Session

Proffered paper session 1: GI tumours, upper digestive

Topics

Targeted Therapy;  Immunotherapy

Tumour Site

Hepatobiliary Cancers

Presenters

Jian Zhou

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_2): 1-72. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1623

Authors

J. Zhou1, J. Fan1, S.C. Jiao2, L. Bai2, J. Luo3, Y. Bai4, Y. Pan5, Y. Gao6, R. Shi7, W. Zhang8, J. Zheng9, X. Hua10, X. Aibing11, S. Hu12, M. Da13, R. Wang14, J. Ma15, W. Jia16, W. Wu17, C. Peng18

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Liver Surgery & Transplantation, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, 200032 - Shanghai/CN
  • 2 Department Of Medical Oncology, Chinese PLA General Hospital (301 Military Hospital), 100853 - Beijing/CN
  • 3 Department Of Hepatobiliary And Intestinal Surgery, Hunan Cancer Hospital and The Afliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, 410013 - Changsha/CN
  • 4 Department Of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Harbin Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital, 150081 - Harbin/CN
  • 5 Department Of Hepatic-biliary-pancreatic Surgery, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, 550000 - Guiyang/CN
  • 6 Department Of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, 230022 - Hefei/CN
  • 7 Department Of Imaging, The Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, 563000 - Zunyi/CN
  • 8 Hepatobiliary Center, Gansu Wuwei Tumor Hospital, 733000 - Wuwei/CN
  • 9 Department Of Hepatobiliary And Pancreatic Surgery, Hainan General Hospital, 570311 - Haikou/CN
  • 10 Department Of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, 110042 - Shenyang/CN
  • 11 Department Of Interventional Therapy, Nantong Fifth People's Hospital/Nantong Tumor Hospital, 226361 - Nantong/CN
  • 12 Department Of Oncology, Hubei Cancer Hospital, 430079 - Wuhan/CN
  • 13 Department Of Surgical Oncology, Gansu Provincial Hospital, 730000 - Lanzhou/CN
  • 14 Department Of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, 233004 - Bengbu/CN
  • 15 Department Of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, 530021 - Nanning/CN
  • 16 Department Of General Surgery, Anhui Provincial Hospital, Hefei/CN
  • 17 Department Of General Surgery, The sixth people‘s hospital of shenyang, 110006 - Shenyang/CN
  • 18 Department Of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, 410005 - Changsha/CN

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract LBA40

Background

This randomized, controlled, openlabel, multicenter, phase III study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib (VEGFR/PDGFR/FGFR/c-kit-TKI) + penpulimab (anti-PD-1 IgG1 monoclonal antibody) vs sorafenib as 1L therapy for aHCC.

Methods

Eligible pts with aHCC were randomized 2:1 to anlotinib (10 mg, po, qd, d1-14) plus penpulimab (200 mg, iv, q3w) or sorafenib (400 mg, po, bid). Pts were stratified by macrovascular invasion and/or extrahepatic metastases, baseline serum AFP (<400 vs ≥400 ng/mL), and ECOG PS (0 vs 1). The dual primary endpoints were PFS (per RECIST v1.1 by IRC) and OS; secondary endpoints included PFS, ORR, DCR, DOR and safety. The final analysis for PFS was done after 312 PFS events occurred and the planned interim analysis of OS was done after 332 deaths occurred.

Results

649 pts were randomized (anlotinib + penpulimab, 433; sorafenib, 216). Demographic and baseline characteristics were generally balanced across arms. Overall, 41% of pts had macrovascular invasion, and 62% had extrahepatic metastasis. At the final analysis for PFS (data cutoff: 5 June 2023), 313 PFS events had occurred. The median PFS was significantly improved with anlotinib + penpulimab vs sorafenib (6.9 mo [95% CI 5.8-8.0] vs 2.8 mo [2.7-4.1]; HR 0.53 [95% CI 0.41-0.68]); p<0.0001). At interim analysis for OS (data cutoff: 29 January 2024), 338 OS events had occurred. The median OS was significantly prolonged with anlotinib + penpulimab vs sorafenib (16.5 mo [95% CI 14.7-19.7] vs 13.2 mo [95% CI 9.7-16.9]; HR 0.69 [95% CI 0.52-0.92]; p=0.0013). Incidence rates of grade ≥3 TRAEs were 48.2% in the anlotinib+penpulimab arm and 47.4% in the sorafenib arm. AEs leading to dose modification (16.2% vs 29.9%) were lower with anlotinib + penpulimab compared with sorafenib. The incidence of any grade immune-mediated AEs was lower in anlotinib+penpulimab-treated pts: pneumonitis (2.5%), colitis (0.9%), and hepatitis (0.5%).

Conclusions

The combination of anlotinib + penpulimab significantly prolonged PFS and OS vs sorafenib with no new safety signals observed, and presents as a new 1L treatment option for aHCC.

Clinical trial identification

NCT04344158.

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd.

Funding

Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.