Abstract LBA40
Background
This randomized, controlled, openlabel, multicenter, phase III study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib (VEGFR/PDGFR/FGFR/c-kit-TKI) + penpulimab (anti-PD-1 IgG1 monoclonal antibody) vs sorafenib as 1L therapy for aHCC.
Methods
Eligible pts with aHCC were randomized 2:1 to anlotinib (10 mg, po, qd, d1-14) plus penpulimab (200 mg, iv, q3w) or sorafenib (400 mg, po, bid). Pts were stratified by macrovascular invasion and/or extrahepatic metastases, baseline serum AFP (<400 vs ≥400 ng/mL), and ECOG PS (0 vs 1). The dual primary endpoints were PFS (per RECIST v1.1 by IRC) and OS; secondary endpoints included PFS, ORR, DCR, DOR and safety. The final analysis for PFS was done after 312 PFS events occurred and the planned interim analysis of OS was done after 332 deaths occurred.
Results
649 pts were randomized (anlotinib + penpulimab, 433; sorafenib, 216). Demographic and baseline characteristics were generally balanced across arms. Overall, 41% of pts had macrovascular invasion, and 62% had extrahepatic metastasis. At the final analysis for PFS (data cutoff: 5 June 2023), 313 PFS events had occurred. The median PFS was significantly improved with anlotinib + penpulimab vs sorafenib (6.9 mo [95% CI 5.8-8.0] vs 2.8 mo [2.7-4.1]; HR 0.53 [95% CI 0.41-0.68]); p<0.0001). At interim analysis for OS (data cutoff: 29 January 2024), 338 OS events had occurred. The median OS was significantly prolonged with anlotinib + penpulimab vs sorafenib (16.5 mo [95% CI 14.7-19.7] vs 13.2 mo [95% CI 9.7-16.9]; HR 0.69 [95% CI 0.52-0.92]; p=0.0013). Incidence rates of grade ≥3 TRAEs were 48.2% in the anlotinib+penpulimab arm and 47.4% in the sorafenib arm. AEs leading to dose modification (16.2% vs 29.9%) were lower with anlotinib + penpulimab compared with sorafenib. The incidence of any grade immune-mediated AEs was lower in anlotinib+penpulimab-treated pts: pneumonitis (2.5%), colitis (0.9%), and hepatitis (0.5%).
Conclusions
The combination of anlotinib + penpulimab significantly prolonged PFS and OS vs sorafenib with no new safety signals observed, and presents as a new 1L treatment option for aHCC.
Clinical trial identification
NCT04344158.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd.
Funding
Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
LBA38 - Iparomlimab and tuvonralimab (QL1706) with bevacizumab and/or chemotherapy in first-line (1L) treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC): A randomized, open-label, phase II/III study (DUBHE-H-308)
Presenter: Shukui Qin
Session: Proffered paper session 1: GI tumours, upper digestive
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
Webcast
LBA39 - Updated efficacy and safety data from IMbrave050: Phase III study of adjuvant atezolizumab (atezo) + bevacizumab (bev) vs active surveillance in patients (pts) with resected or ablated high-risk hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)
Presenter: Adam Yopp
Session: Proffered paper session 1: GI tumours, upper digestive
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
Webcast
Invited Discussant LBA38 and LBA39
Presenter: Maeve Lowery
Session: Proffered paper session 1: GI tumours, upper digestive
Resources:
Slides
Webcast
Q&A
Session: Proffered paper session 1: GI tumours, upper digestive
Resources:
Webcast
LBA62 - Preoperative modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) with or without chemoradiation (CRT) in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC): Results from the randomized phase II trial PANDAS/PRODIGE 44
Presenter: Aurélien Lambert
Session: Proffered paper session 1: GI tumours, upper digestive
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
Webcast
Invited Discussant LBA62 and LBA40
Presenter: Rachna Shroff
Session: Proffered paper session 1: GI tumours, upper digestive
Resources:
Slides
Webcast
Q&A
Session: Proffered paper session 1: GI tumours, upper digestive
Resources:
Webcast