Abstract 122P
Background
Interdisciplinary Molecular Tumor Boards (MTB) are increasingly implemented to account for the growing complexity in molecular oncology, yet data on MTB practice patterns and patient benefit are heterogeneous. Our aim was to determine local practice patterns and treatment response data of MTB-directed therapies.
Methods
In this retrospective cohort study, consecutive patients referred to the MTB of the Medical University of Graz from 2021-2023 were included. Patients were referred with either existing molecular profiles, or additional genomic sequencing from tissue/liquid biopsies and/or immunohistochemistry was performed. Treatment recommendations were based on ESMO Scale for Clinical Actionability of Molecular Targets (ESCAT) levels. Preliminary treatment response outcomes were disease control rate (DCR), overall response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR).
Results
Overall, 249 patients referred to the MTB Graz were included, including external referrals from regional and national centres (18%). The median time from referral to MTB recommendation was 26 days. The most frequent cancer types were breast- (n=69), pancreatic- (n=42), colorectal- (n=24), and non-small cell lung cancer (n=24). Molecular profiling was performed in 88.8% of referred patients (n=221). An actionable alteration was identified in 115 patients (46.2%), comprising ESCAT level I recommendations in 33%, level II in 21% and level III in 45%. MTB-recommended treatment was so far initiated in 57 patients (23%). Common reasons for not implementing treatment was clinical deterioration (n=25) and ongoing previous therapies (n=22). The DCR in treated patients was 45% and ORR was 19%. In the subgroup of patients with ESCAT level I-II recommendations, DCR was 58% and ORR was 29%. Sustained treatment responses (i.e., >12 months DOR) were observed in 12% of treated patients.
Conclusions
A substantial rate of targetable alterations was detected in patients referred to the MTB. Promising treatment response patterns were observed in a subset of patients treated with MTB-recommended therapies. Additional detailed genomic analyses of included patients and treatment response evaluations can be presented at the meeting.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
112P - Reporting of molecular test results from cell-free DNA analyses: Expert consensus recommendations from the 2023 European Liquid Biopsy Society ctDNA workshop
Presenter: Vincent de Jager
Session: Poster session 08
114P - Prevalence and landscape of pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variants in cancer predisposition genes among selected patients with lung adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Oscar Gerardo Arrieta Rodriguez
Session: Poster session 08
115P - Gene rearrangements, actionability and access to precision medicine: Results from the ARCAGEN study
Presenter: Marie Morfouace
Session: Poster session 08
116P - Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals a subset of FSIP1 cancer cells and verified its value of prognosis in lung adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Xiaochen Zhang
Session: Poster session 08
Resources:
Abstract
117P - Methylome and transcriptome profiling of hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach
Presenter: Shirong Zhang
Session: Poster session 08
Resources:
Abstract
118P - Comparative analysis of DNA and RNA-based NGS for detecting MET exon 14 skipping mutation in pan-solid tumor samples
Presenter: Ruijun Cai
Session: Poster session 08
119P - Predicting the pathogenicity of novel fusion genes and explaining reasons using a large language model: A focused assessment
Presenter: Katsuhiko Murakami
Session: Poster session 08
120P - A prospective comparative evaluation of automatic trial match tools in a molecular tumor board
Presenter: Lilia GUEGUEN
Session: Poster session 08